Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay

, ,

Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay

In earlier topics, you explored the tenet of conscious leadership and the influence of self-awareness on your leadership style. You established that a clear understanding of your abilities, motivation, and goals provides a firm foundation for leading others. Leadership studies demonstrate that the most effective leaders know how to draw upon self-leadership skills to in turn motivate and lead others to expand their strengths to ultimately better serve the goals of an organization. For this assignment, you will continue to study conscious leadership and look at a leadership example from contemporary media and evaluate how well the particular leader exemplifies the qualities of effective and ethical conscious leadership. Then, you will compose your own leadership philosophy statement to articulate the qualities that will make you an effective conscious leader of people and organizations. Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Part 1:

For Part 1, select a relevant and topical leadership issue from current news media that revolves around ethics and ethical decision making. Topics must be approved by your instructor. Once approved, research the situation and gather data in order to evaluate the dynamics of the situation. Write an evaluation (500-750 words) of the situation that addresses the following:

  1. The power bases used by the leader.
  2. The influence tactics used by the leader.
  3. The leadership style of the leader.
  4. The outcome (or potential outcome) of the situation.

Conclude by justifying whether or not you think this leader supports the values of conscious capitalism. Is the leader’s leadership style effective? Do you believe the leader acted ethically in the situation? Be sure to consider each tenet of conscious capitalism in your leader evaluation.

Next, imagine yourself as a practitioner of servant leadership. You have been appointed into the leadership role in this same circumstance. Explain how the situation would be different. Address the four criteria listed above in your discussion and incorporate the principles of conscious capitalism by explaining how your personal values and style are influenced by each tenet.

Part 2:

For Part 2, develop a leadership philosophy statement as an appendix to your evaluation in Part 1. Begin by reviewing your self-assessment results from Topic 2 and reflecting on what you have learned about effective leadership and conscious capitalism in the course. Keep in mind that one’s leadership philosophy is a unique statement that encapsulates your own view of leadership, so the final product may vary, but your statement should incorporate the following:

  1. Personal values and beliefs that influence your leadership style.
  2. Past experiences or people that have influenced the development of those values.
  3. Expectations of self and others.
  4. Leadership style and influence tactics.

Your goal is to create a distinctive statement (250-500 words) that incorporates the elements outlined above. The end product should clearly articulate how you view yourself as a leader and how others would view you as a leader. It should also make clear how you can contribute to the success of other people and an organization as a whole.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
MGT-605 MGT-605-O500 Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy 130.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 75.0%
Evaluation of Power Bases 10.0% Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is provided, but at a cursory level. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is clear and integrated. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is thorough and well integrated.
Evaluation of Influence Tactics 10.0% Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is provided, but at a cursory level. Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is clear and integrated. Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is thorough and well integrated.
Evaluation of Leadership Style 10.0% Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is provided, but at a cursory level. Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is clear and integrated. Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is thorough and well integrated.
Evaluation of Outcome 10.0% Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is provided, but at a cursory level. There is some explanation to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes. Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is clear and integrated. There is a complete explanation to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes. Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is thorough and well integrated. There is detailed evidence to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.
Servant Leadership Discussion 10.0% A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is provided, but at a cursory level. A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is clear and integrated. A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is thorough and well integrated.
Leadership Philosophy Statement 25.0% There is no leadership philosophy statement included. Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay The leadership philosophy statement is included, but lacks details or is incomplete. The leadership philosophy statement includes personal views, past experiences, expectations of self and others, and a personal leadership style, but requires further details. The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all required elements. There is an explanation of how the student views own leadership style, how others view the leadership style of the student, and how this contributes to the success of an organization. The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all required elements and specific leadership examples. There is a clear explanation of how the student views own leadership style, how other view the leadership style of the student, and how this contributes to the success of an organization.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

Leadership Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy Essay