Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

, ,

Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

To Prepare for the Discussion:

  • Review the Learning Resources.
  • Select one of the following topics for the Discussion:
    • Adoption
    • Foster care
    • Gender dysphoria
    • Forensic issues
    • Impact of terrorism on children

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Post:

  • Write your selected disorder in the subject line of your Discussion post.
  • Explain the psychological issues that may result from your topic.
  • Describe the most effective assessment measure that could be used, and explain why you selected this.
  • Explain the treatment options available for children and adolescents involved with your selected disorder.
  • Explain how culture may influence treatment.

Provide a minimum of three academic references. Including Introduction and Conclusion

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

“* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) * Is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources * Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources ”

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

“* Responds to the discussion question(s) * Is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * Supported by at least three credible references”

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

“* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) * Is somewhat re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * Supported by at least three credible references”

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

“* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * One to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed * Is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis * Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * Post is cited with fewer than two credible references”

0 (0%) – 30 (30%) “* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * Lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria * Lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis * Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module * Contains only one or no credible references”

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

“* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling errors * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style”

Name: NRNP_6660_Week11_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 2/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

“* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts main discussion by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) “* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * Responds to questions posed by faculty * The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives”

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* Response is on topic and may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Response may not be on topic and lacks depth

First Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

“* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in standard edited English”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited ”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited”

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 3/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

First Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * Does not meet requirements for full participation

Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) “* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * Responds to questions posed by faculty * The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives”

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) “* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

“* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in standard edited English”

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in standard edited English”

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

“* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited ”

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) “* Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited”

11/3/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16727056_1&rubric_id=_1840502_1 4/4Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Second Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “* Meets requirements for timely and full participation * Posts by due date”

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6660_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

Discussion: Special Topics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (WEEK 11)