Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Critical Appraisal [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188)
Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper—examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010c). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.
In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

Critical Appraisal

Evidence-based practice attempts to bridge the gap between research and nursing practice. The technique makes scientific evidence in supporting clinical decisions. It is, however, important to remember that nursing practice revolves around caring for the patient. Critical appraisals critique the quality of research based on experience and research praxis. This write-up presents a critique of four clinical articles detailing the use of normal saline in hospital-acquired infections, discussing the level of evidence, specifications of the studies, key findings, and the studies’ strengths and weaknesses.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

Dancer, S. J. (2014) highlights the role of the environment in hospital-acquired infections and new decontamination technologies. This research is important since hospital-acquired infections often stem from contamination of surfaces and equipment. The study delves into the management strategies against hospital-acquired infections. The author then gives an account of various aspects of the environment, relating the aspects to the strategies discussed. The study is a literature review categorized under level V evidence and, as such, no conflict of interest. Dancer (2014) aims to determine the efficiency of primary disinfectants and give insight into ways of enhancing the efficacy of decontamination tools within healthcare organizations. The study is qualitative and pays attention to decontaminants’ potency and disinfectants and their effectiveness in combating hospital-acquired infections. The research findings guarantee the accuracy, demonstrating that the results will be crucial in decontaminating hospital facilities and improving patient satisfaction.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

Neubeiser et al. (2020) give insight into hospital-acquired infections, pointing out the degree of antibiotics’ impact on patients’ mortality from these infections. The authors also demonstrate the process by which individuals acquire multi-drug resistance. The study emphasizes that there is a higher risk of patients succumbing to consequent medical issues. The research’s objective was to establish the number of hospital-acquired infections with multi-drug resistance and determine the annual mortality in 32 healthcare organizations. This critique the deceased’s medical charts objectively, ensuring that the patients passed away due to hospital-acquired infections. The study is quantitative and uses SPSS in data analysis, reporting the findings based on dichotomous data. The research is reliable and offers valid insights into enhancing safety in hospital facilities.

Palmqvist et al. (2019) describe particular events that precede hospital-acquired infections. The study suggests that uncovered hospital surfaces account for most hospital-acquired infections, paying particular attention to CT scans and MRI. The research provides a criterion for identifying clusters of infectious agents on hospital equipment and can therefore be used in developing health policies for disinfection and decontamination. The researchers aimed at identifying surfaces that increase the risk for hospital-acquired infections and, as a result, establish the incidence of these infections. The study also evaluates the disparities between private and public radiological diagnostic equipment. The research is quantitative, presenting the results numerically, thus guaranteeing accuracy and reliability.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.

Lastly, Yan et al. (2018) focuses on the risk of hospital-acquired infections and proposes management strategies to lower the cost of hospitalizations. The study identifies high-risk patients in various hospital departments, including dialysis, hematology, and intensive care. The critique established that the research has no ethical concerns since the relevant institutional ethics board approved the data collected. The study aims at detailing reviews of patients with hospital-acquired respiratory infections. The authors also consider these infections’ financial implications, concluding that their prevention in high-risk facilities cuts down on hospitalization costs. Statistical data presentation, as used in the study, enhances the accuracy and reliability of the study.Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Paper.