Analyzing Group Techniques Assignment Discussion

Analyzing Group Techniques Assignment Discussion

In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:
• What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
• What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
• What did you notice that the therapist did well?
• Explain something that you would have handled differently.
• What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

• Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Paper should include an introduction, summary, and references please

NRNP 6645- PMHNP- Analyzing group techniques

Group therapy has the potential to boost a person’s well-being through reduction of worries as well as anxieties but within a supportive environment that has both peers and a therapist. It is therefore a therapeutic technique that offers promotion through healing by creating an environment through which patients can exchange their experiences openly and acquire the appropriate guidance from an expert. There are several benefits associated with group therapy, among them being offering a collaborative learning among the participants, and making use of therapeutic techniques to offer assistance to individuals who are exploring alternative strategies for managing symptoms such as depression, sadness, and anxiety. The aim of this paper is to assess the efficacy of vital therapies, with a main focus on the psychotherapy for schizophrenia video.

The main content of the video is demonstrating the use of cognitive behavioral therapy as a collective treatment technique. The facilitators in the video utilized these tactics, thereby encouraging patients to disclose all their fears and engage in discussions concerning their effective coping strategies. According to Research, cognitive behavioral treatment has a significant impact towards reducing the necessity for inpatient hospitalization as well as improving the satisfaction of patients (Carr et al., 2018). Further research emphasizes on the proven benefits of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) towards empowering individuals to improve more on their understanding as well as management of mental health problems (Cheung et al., 2019). The group leaders in the video demonstrated competence through introducing themselves, highlighting the meeting’s objectives, setting the group’s guidelines, and managing subsequent phone calls (Gerber, 2013).

If offered the opportunity, I would make changes in the arrangement of clients during these group sessions through strategically spacing them out in a larger circular form. The aim of this change would be to avoid more stimulation as well as discomfort that might occur when group members sit too close to each other. From the current arrangement, that fails to include a complete loop, it somehow appears unusual. Despite being not sure on whether the problem was spacing, my thoughts are that creating a captivating arrangement may be achieved through making use of a larger circle. The video offered quality insights, especially through the comprehensive examination of the agenda, formulation of the rules, and emphasis that it had towards the significance of follow-up. As an engaged individual towards offering guidance to inpatient groups, I was initially uncertain but have since improved my potential towards identifying conversational themes. The video further provided a thorough understanding of the acknowledging process as well as the process of appreciating patient responses, hence enhancing my approach. In my case, I usually begin with presenting a subject, then followed by asking open-ended questions to the entire group, hence providing every group member with the opportunity to give a response. While this is an effective strategy in general, there are several situations where not all individuals engage participate or certain individuals tend to monopolize the discussion. This video has therefore provided me with valuable insights into alternative approaches, including conducting a comprehensive study of a given topic and individually seeking all the input from every patient from the group, hence ensuring that everyone contributes equally.

I have in the past encountered challenges when leading groups with individuals that display challenging personalities. Managing such situations in most cases depend on the particular patient, the dynamics of the group, as well as the perceptions of the group members. During a certain scenario, a patient exhibited some manic and delusional conduct through displaying active involvement that had no any beneficial contributions. Despite multiple attempts to solve this, the discussion was no longer productive. In another different circumstance, a juvenile patient that had been admitted to the hospital for a long period due to attention deficits that are typical among individuals in their age bracket also posed such a challenge. To address these disruptive misconducts triggered by a “ringleader,” I decided to isolate the individual from the rest of the group members. After this, there was an improvement in group dynamics and a more peaceful environment was established. If any group member displays an inappropriate behavior that disturbs the rest, it is considered prudent to eliminate them from the group to ensure that the well-being of the other patients is preserved (Carr et al., 2018).

When conducting group sessions, I regularly ensure that I engage in discussions and prompts that each member of the group is able to contribute in terms of their thoughts and past experiences, especially in relation to strategies for anxiety management. Through my experience of working with both children and teenagers, I have discovered that making use of games within group therapy sessions substantially improves their involvement and participation levels. When making analyses of the multiple stages of group therapy, individuals are at high chance of advancing through different phases through which they recognize their personal perspectives and acquire relevant knowledge from their peers’ perspectives. The stages of group therapy include the progression of the group towards becoming more open, gaining understanding, showing utmost respect, and valuing all the contributions that each member makes (Cheung et al., 2019). Through sharing individual personal experiences within the group enhances a broader range of perspectives and enhances a process of healing that is collective for all the members of the group. Group therapy is therefore beneficial since it involves teaching alternative techniques for all the ever changing symptoms among disorders such as depression and anxiety, which might be applied practically in everyday situations (Li et al., 2020).

In summary, group therapy is a beneficial treatment method towards enabling individuals to openly exchange and acquire ideas from other group members who have experienced similar situations. As healthcare providers, advocating for group therapy is essential since it provide an added advantage through facilitating the development of various coping strategies as well as emphasizing on the need of not entirely depending on medicine as a holistic therapeutic option.

References

Carr, E. R., McKernan, L. C., Hillbrand, M., & Hamlett, N. (2018). Expanding traditional paradigms: An integrative approach to the psychotherapeutic treatment of psychosis. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/int0000083

Cheung, J. M., Jarrin, D. C., Ballot, O., Bharwani, A. A., & Morin, C. M. (2019). A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia implemented in primary care and community settings. Sleep medicine reviews44, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2018.11.001

Gerber, B. (2013, November 21). Psychotherapy group for schizophrenia [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6CF09f5S1M

Li, X., Kivlighan, D. M., Paquin Jr., J. D., & Gold, P. B. (2020). What was that session like? An empirically-derived typology of group therapy sessions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/gdn0000139 Analyzing Group Techniques Assignment Discussion

NRNP-6645-week 3 assignment

ANALYZING GROUP TECHNIQUES

Group therapy can alleviate feelings of isolation and foster a supportive and collaborative environment for sharing difficult feelings in order to facilitate healing. For many people, being part of a group that has a shared understanding of a struggle provides a unique opportunity to gain understanding of their own experiences.

As you examine one of the group therapy demonstrations from this week’s Learning Resources, consider the role and efficacy of the leader and the reasons that specific therapeutic techniques were selected.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersLinks to an external site.(5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
    • “Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis”
  • Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice(3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
    • Chapter 12, “Group Therapy”
  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The therapeutic factors. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapyDownload The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 1–18). Basic Books.
    Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.
  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Interpersonal learning. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapyDownload The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 19–52). Basic Books.
    Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.
  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Group cohesiveness. In The theory and practice of group psychotherapyDownload The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.) (pp. 53–76). Basic Books.
    Credit: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. Copyright 2005 by Basic Books. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Required Media

  • Cats Cats. (2016, September 29). Interpersonal group therapy for addiction recovery demonstrationLinks to an external site.[Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/szS31h0kMI0
  • Gerber, B. (2013, November 21). Psychotherapy group for schizophreniaLinks to an external site.[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8Dzus8WGqA
  • Henson, B. A. (2017, April 27). Role play: Group counseling for adolescents with anxietyLinks to an external site.[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6CF09f5S1M
  • (2009, May 6). Irvin Yalom inpatient group psychotherapy videoLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05Elmr65RDg
  • (2009, May 7). Irvin Yalom outpatient group psychotherapy videoLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/PwnfWMNbg48

To prepare:

  • Select one of the group therapy video demonstrations from this week’s required media Learning Resources.

THE ASSIGNMENT

In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:

  • What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
  • What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
  • What did you notice that the therapist did well?
  • Explain something that you would have handled differently.
  • What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
  • Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
  • Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

ReminderLinks to an external site. The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.

ORDER NOW

Rubric

NRNP_6645_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6645_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 3- to 4-page paper considering the role and efficacy of the leader of a group therapy demonstration. Be sure to address the following: ·   Describe the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated and evaluate how well they were demonstrated. . Include evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and thoroughly describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video…. The response includes somewhat vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video are vague and inaccurate, or missing…. The response includes vague and inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques, or is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·   Identify what the therapist did well. ·   Explain something that you would have handled differently. ·   Identify an insight that you gained form watching the therapist handle the group therapy.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response accurately explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response accurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy, or is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImagine that you are leading your own group session. ·   Describe how would you go about handling a difficult group member. ·   Explain how you would elicit participation in your group. ·   Describe what you would anticipate to find in different phases of the group therapy. ·   Explain the benefits and challenges of group therapy.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response includes a detailed and accurate description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response accurately and thoroughly explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response thoroughly and accurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation the benefits and challenges of group therapy.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response includes a description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response explains the benefits and challenges of group therapy.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy…. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy…. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explaination of the benefits and challenges of group therapy.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response includes a vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy, or is missing…. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy, or is missing…. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explaination the benefits and challenges of group therapy, or is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected provide strong justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs are attached.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected to provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs are attached.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Two peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected to provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. Or, three scholarly resources are used to support the assignment, but provide only weak support for reasoning or do not represent the latest in standards of care. PDFs may not be attached.

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Resources selected are not peer-reviewed and evidence-based, or provide poor justification for reasoning; or resources are missing.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100