Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group

20 points

Criteria Description

Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group

5. Excellent

20 points

A detailed description of ethnic minority group is partially presented. Health status for this group is thoroughly discussed. Explanation of how race and ethnicity influence health for this group is clearly presented. A well-developed comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented.

4. Good

17.8 points

Description of ethnic minority group is partially presented. Health status for this group is discussed. Explanation of how race and ethnicity influence health for this group is presented. A comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Satisfactory Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

15.8 points Summary of ethnic minority group is partially presented. Health status for this group is generally discussed. Explanation of how race and ethnicity influence health this group is generally presented. It is unclear how the health status of this ethnic minority group compares to the national average. A general comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Description of ethnic minority group is partially presented. Health status for this group is vague. It is unclear how race and ethnicity influence health for this group.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Description and health status for ethnic minority group is not presented.

Health Disparities and Nutritional Challenges for Minority Group

30 points

Criteria Description

Health Disparities and Nutritional Challenges for Minority Group

5. Excellent

30 points

A thorough discussion of the health disparities and nutritional challenges for this group is clearly presented. All relevant findings related to the ethnic minority group have been included. A well-developed comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented.

4. Good

26.7 points

A discussion of the health disparities and nutritional challenges for this group is presented. The significant findings related to the ethnic minority group have been included. A comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

A discussion of the health disparities and nutritional challenges for this group is generally presented. Most significant findings related to the ethnic minority group have been included. A general comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Some support is needed to support statements.

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

A summary of the health disparities and nutritional challenges for this group is presented. Significant details have been omitted. Summary lacks evidence to support statements.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health disparities and nutritional challenges for this group are not presented.

Barriers to Health for Minority Group

30 points

Criteria Description

Barriers to Health for Minority Group

5. Excellent

30 points

Barriers to health for this ethnic minority group resulting from culture, socioeconomics, education, and sociopolitical factors are thoroughly discussed. A well-developed comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Compelling and accurate evidence is provided to support statements.

4. Good

26.7 points

Barriers to health for this ethnic minority group resulting from culture, socioeconomics, education, and sociopolitical factors are discussed. A comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Minor evidence is needed to support statements. Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

Barriers to health for ethnic minority group are summarized. The summary includes barriers resulting from culture, socioeconomics, education, and sociopolitical factors. There are some inaccuracies. A general comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Some evidence is needed to support statements.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

Barriers to health for ethnic minority group are partially presented. The summary is not consistent with the assignment criteria. There are significant inaccuracies. Summary lacks evidence to support statements.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Barriers to health for ethnic minority group are not presented.

Health Promotion Activities Practiced by Minority Group

20 points

Criteria Description

Health Promotion Activities Practiced by Minority Group

5. Excellent

20 points

Health promotion activities practiced by minority groups are accurately identified and described in detail. A well-developed comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Compelling and accurate evidence is provided to support statements.

4. Good

17.8 points

Health promotion activities practiced by minority groups are described. A comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Minor evidence is needed to support statements.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Health promotion activities practiced by minority groups are generally described. There are minor inaccuracies. A general comparison for how the ethnic minority group compares to the national average is presented. Some evidence is needed to support statements.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Health promotion activities practiced by minority groups are partially summarized. There are significant inaccuracies. Summary lacks evidence to support statements.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health promotion activities practiced by minority groups are not presented.

Three Levels of Health Promotion Prevention

30 points

Criteria Description

Three Levels of Health Promotion Prevention

5. Excellent

30 points

A care plan, with at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention, is thoroughly described. A well-supported explanation of how this plan meets the unique needs of the ethnic minority group selected, and why it is the most effective choice, is presented. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the three levels of health promotion prevention and their application to a unique group.

4. Good

26.7 points

A care plan, with at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention, is described. An explanation of how this plan meets the unique needs of the ethnic minority group selected, and why it is the most effective choice, is presented. Minor support or rationale is needed. Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

A care plan, with at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention, is summarized. A general explanation of how this plan meets the unique needs of the ethnic minority group selected, and why it is the most effective choice, is presented. Some support or rationale is needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

A care plan, with at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention, is partially presented. It is unclear how this plan meets the unique needs of the ethnic minority group selected. There are inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A care plan, with at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention, is not presented.

Cultural Competent Health Promotion for Ethnic Minority Population

30 points

Criteria Description

Cultural Competent Health Promotion for Ethnic Minority Population

5. Excellent

30 points

Cultural beliefs and practices to be considered are thoroughly discussed. A relevant cultural theory or model is proposed. Overall, the content strongly supports a culturally competent health promotion for this population. Strong evidence and rational are provided for support. The discussion demonstrates aptitude for understanding cultural competence and developing culturally competent health promotions.

4. Good

26.7 points

Cultural beliefs and practices to be considered are discussed. A relevant cultural theory or model is proposed. Overall, the content generally supports a culturally competent health promotion for this population. Some evidence or rationale is needed. Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

3. Satisfactory

23.7 points

Cultural beliefs and practices to be considered are summarized. A relevant cultural theory or model is proposed. Overall, the content generally supports a culturally competent health promotion for this population. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

22.5 points

Cultural beliefs and practices to be considered are presented but are incomplete or inaccurate. The cultural theory or model proposed is partially presented; or, the model is not relevant. Overall, the content does not support a culturally competent health promotion for this population. There are significant inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Cultural beliefs, practices, and relevant cultural theory significant to supporting a culturally competent health promotion for this population are not presented.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

10 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Excellent

10 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

4. Good

8.9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Satisfactory

7.9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

10 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Excellent

10 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Good

8.9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

7.9 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

10 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

5. Excellent

10 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

4. Good

8.9 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Satisfactory

7.9 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

7.5 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Excellent

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Good

3.56 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Excellent

6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Good

5.34 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Satisfactory

4.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

ORDER HERE

Total200 points Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay

Describe the ethnic minority group selected. Describe the current health status of this group. How do race and ethnicity influence health for this group?
What are the health disparities that exist for this group? What are the nutritional challenges for this group?
Discuss the barriers to health for this group resulting from culture, socioeconomics, education, and sociopolitical factors.
What health promotion activities are often practiced by this group?
Describe at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) that is likely to be the most effective in a care plan given the unique needs of the minority group you have selected. Provide an explanation of why it might be the most effective choice.
What cultural beliefs or practices must be considered when creating a care plan? What cultural theory or model would be best to support culturally competent health promotion for this population? Why? Identification and Description of Selected Minority Group Essay