Family Assessment Part I and II Essay
Family Assessment Part I and II Essay
Family Health Assessment part 1
This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.
Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health patterns for each of the following:
Values/Health Perception
Nutrition
Sleep/Rest
Elimination
Activity/Exercise
Cognitive
Sensory-Perception
Self-Perception
Role Relationship
Sexuality
Coping
Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM -FREE PAPER NOW
Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an appendix with your assignment.
Include the following in your paper:
Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.
Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.
Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Family Assessment Part I and II Essay. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.
Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over time.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
textbook
Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum.
Read Chapter 4 in Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum.
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/health-promotion_health-and-wellness-across-the-continuum_1e.php
Electronic Resource
1. Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and the Professional
Read “Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and the Professional,” by Leahey and Wright, from Journal of Family Nursing (2016).
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1074840716667972
Family Health Assessment Part II
Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following: Family Assessment Part I and II Essay.
Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning.
Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Please follow the attached RUBRIC WELL, so I can get all my score this time.
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-429VN NRS-429VN-O501 Family Assessment Part II 150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (89.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 80.0%
SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status 20.0% SDOH affecting family health status, and the direct impact to the family, are not presented.Family Assessment Part I and II Essay. SDOH affecting family health status are partially presented. SDOH listed are not relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are unclear. There are inaccuracies. Key SDOH affecting family health status are summarized. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are generally discussed. More support or rationale is needed in some areas. The overall SDOH affecting family health status are accurately identified and described. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed. The SDOH directly affecting family health status are relevant, accurately identified and thoroughly described. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail. The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on family health status.
Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations 20.0% Age-appropriate screenings are not presented. Screenings are presented for some family members. The screenings are not age appropriate. Screenings are not relevant to the information gathered through family health assessment. Screenings are presented for each family member. Screenings are generally age appropriate, but entirely not relevant based on the information gathered through family health assessment. More rationale and support is required. Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate. Screenings are relevant and based on the information gathered through family health assessment. Some minor rationale or support is needed. Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate and highly relevant. Screenings correlate to the information gathered through family health assessment. Strong rationale and support is presented.
Assessment of Health Model 20.0% A health model to assist in the creation of a plan of action is not presented. The model chosen is not a health model. A health model is selected to assist in creating a plan of action. The description of the model is incomplete. It is unclear why the chosen model is best for this family. A health model is selected and described. A summary of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. A general overview for why it is best for this family is provided. More rationale and support is required. A health model is selected and described. A discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are provided. Some rationale or support is needed. A health model is selected and thoroughly described. Family Assessment Part I and II Essay. A detailed discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are clearly outlined. Strong rationale and support are provided to support reasoning.
Application of Health Model 20.0% Family-centered health promotion using selected health model is omitted. Steps for a family-centered health promotion are partially presented. The health promotion is not based on the health model. Significant aspects are missing. There are major inaccuracies. The health model is used to create a general family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome require more detail to illustrate a clear plan of action. A general plan for communication with the family is presented. More rationale and support is required. The health model is used to create a relevant family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are illustrated. Strategies for communication with the family are presented. The health model is used to create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are described in detail. Appropriate strategies for communication with the family are clearly presented. The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve desired outcomes.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Family Assessment Part I and II Essay.The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Family Assessment Part I and II Essay. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%
Family Assessment Part II
Name:
Institution:
Introduction
A family health assessment is crucial in evaluating families and examining the areas where the family members need to need to work on so that they improve the entire health status of the family. Most often, family members are evaluated using functional health patterns which provide various functions which must be examined. The social determinants of health (SDOH) refer to the complex circumstances which have the potential to influence individuals’ health, and they include political, socioeconomic, education, and accessibility of healthcare. The literature examines a plan of actions that can be incorporate health promotion strategies for Johnson’s family. Family Assessment Part I and II Essay.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM -FREE PAPER NOW
The various social determinants of health that are affecting Johnson’s family comprises of economic, social, and personal factors. Financial problems affect the family to access quality care; both Mr. and Mrs. Johnson have to work hard so that they can support the family. Lack of money has prevented Mrs. Johnson from looking for medication to manage diabetes; this has also limited the number of health checkup to one per year. Additionally, it is important to note that Mr. Johnson has weight issues but does not consider it as a major health problem; this is serious because being overweight can facilitate other health issues such high blood pressure, diabetes, heart diseases, and kidney issues among others.
Additionally, Johnson’s family does not have effective social support that can influence the family members to make decisions that can promote their overall health. Although the family has access to a balanced diet which includes proteins, carbohydrates, and vitamins, among other nutrients, the family goes out regularly, and they all like buying food from restaurants. Having food from restaurants is normally linked with unhealthy food choices, and this is attributed to issues such as obesity and weight gain (Tarro et al., 2017). Proper family support can help in changing what and where the family buys food. All family members have also recorded that they have problems related to remembering.
The impact of the SDOH on the family is that they have made it difficult for the members of the family to acquire regular medical checkup. Instead, the family is limited to a single medical assessment every year. This presents a health risk to Mrs. Johnson, who requires uniform and regular follow-up which can make it possible to review and examine her treatment plans and make it possible for her physician to provide the support required. Also, Mr. Johnson risks further damage to his health as a result of disregarding his body weight. The two daughters have no major health issues, but there is a need for providing them with routine checkups. These factors are mainly prevalent dues to lack of enough money and ignorance regarding health implications of poor health decisions.
Mr. Johnson and Mrs. Johnson are 45 and 38 years old, respectively. It is recommended that Mrs. Johnson should undergo kidney screening; she has diabetes which is high risk for kidney damage (Saunders, Cifu & Vela, 2015). It is also important for Mrs. Johnson to obtain heart disease assessment and neuropathy, Family Assessment Part I and II Essay
