Antitrust Case Analysis Paper
Antitrust Case Analysis Paper
Using the Health Care page of the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division website, locate three antitrust law cases. Write a 500-750 word analysis of each case that describes the following:
- A brief overview of the particulars of the case.
- The impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers.
- Concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Antitrust Case Analysis Paper
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| HLT-520 | HLT-520-O500 | Antitrust Case Analysis | 80.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||
| Particulars of the Case | 30.0% | A description of the particulars of the case is not included. | A description of the particulars of the case is incomplete or incorrect. | A description of the particulars of the case is included but lacks details. | A description of the particulars of the case is complete and includes details. | A description of the particulars of the case is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence. | ||
| Impact of the Case | 20.0% | A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is not included. | A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is incomplete or incorrect. | A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is included but lacks details. | A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is complete and includes details. | A description of the impact of the case on the law and powerbrokers is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence. | ||
| Concerns Regarding the Case | 20.0% | A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is not included. Antitrust Case Analysis Paper | A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is incomplete or incorrect. | A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is included but lacks details. | A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is complete and includes details. | A description of the concerns regarding the case in the role of a health care leader is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence. | ||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Antitrust Case Analysis Paper | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Format | 10.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Antitrust Case Analysis Paper
