Nurse practitioners (NPs) across the nation have different levels of prescriptive authority on medical services, controlled substances, and medications. Before writing a prescription, NPs are obligated to obtain a comprehensive health history, conduct a physical exam, and in other instances, order diagnostic laboratory or radiological tests (Arcangelo et al, 2017). After deciding to prescribe a specific drug, NPs must consider factors such as variations in the mode of action, route of administration, medication costs, side effects, convenience, and interactions. In this paper, the author discusses the ethical and legal implications of prescribing drugs. Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs This knowledge promotes ethical prescribing among NPs, promotes quality care, and patient safety.
Case Overview
A friend calls and asks you to prescribe a medication for her. You have this autonomy, but you don’t have your friend’s medical history. You write the prescription anyway Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs.
Ethical and Legal Implications of Selected Scenario
The most important factors to consider before prescribing drugs for friends or close family members are state-specific laws on prescriptive authority, how regulations by an individual’s state board of nursing address the issue. For instance, the author’s state regulations require NPs to have a collaborative agreement with a physician, and this agreement is limited to a practice setting (Mitchel & Oliphant, 2016). Writing prescriptions without this collaborative agreement violates the state laws and regulations and warrants disciplinary measures.
Prescriber: writing a prescription to a friend minus a comprehensive history and a specific diagnosis beyond a practice setting increase the risk of adverse reactions, subsequent lawsuits, and a revoked license.
Pharmacist: filling a prescription without ascertaining whether a prescriber obtained a patient’s history, and performed a physical assessment increases the likelihood to lose his practice license.
Patient and Patient’s Family: prescribing drugs to friends without obtaining a history and performing a physical examination increases the risk of medication errors, adverse events, and drug-drug interactions (Arcangelo et al, 2017) Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs. Patients are likely to incur additional medical costs in terms of management and can likely sue a prescriber for malpractice.
Strategies to Address Disclosure, Nondisclosure, and Decision Making
The author’s state laws and regulations require that NPs should discuss and educate patients about prescribed medications including the five rights of medication administration. In case of any prescription or medication errors, the laws further require that NPs should disclose related information to relevant stakeholders as this will guide decision making in addressing the issue Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs. Although some NPs prescribe medications for friends and family, it is not a good practice since the close relationship can easily cloud an NPs judgment (Centers for Disease Control, 2016). The two most effective strategies that the author would use to guide decision making are; using a prescriptive decision-making model, and rational prescribing. The former incorporates groups with a special interest, the family, patient, and colleagues and the latter emphasizes the need to ensure that patients are prescribed the appropriate drugs based on identified clinical needs, timing, dosing, and cost.
Explain the Process of Writing Prescriptions
According to the World Health Organization, prescribers must observe the following process when writing prescriptions;
Finally, utilizing the state-specific laws on prescriptive authority, how regulations by an individual’s state board of nursing address the issue can help NP’s provide care within their scop of practice.
References
Arcangelo, V. P., Peterson, A. M., Wilbur, V. F., & Reinhold, J. A. (2017). Pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice: a practical approach. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Centers for Disease Control. (2016). Prescription drug physical exam requirements. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/docs/pdpe-requirements.pdf
Mitchell, A., & Oliphant, C. M. (2016). Responsibility for Ethical Prescribing. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 12(3), A20. Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs
What type of drug should you prescribe based on your patient’s diagnosis? How much of the drug should the patient receive? How often should the drug be administered? When should the drug not be prescribed? Are there individual patient factors that could create complications when taking the drug? Should you be prescribing drugs to this patient? How might different state regulations affect the prescribing of this drug to this patient?
These are some of the questions you might consider when selecting a treatment plan for a patient.Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs.
As an advanced practice nurse prescribing drugs, you are held accountable for people’s lives every day. Patients and their families will often place trust in you because of your position. With this trust comes power and responsibility, as well as an ethical and legal obligation to “do no harm.” It is important that you are aware of current professional, legal, and ethical standards for advanced practice nurses with prescriptive authority. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the treatment plans and administration/prescribing of drugs is in accordance with the regulations of the state in which you practice Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs. Understanding how these regulations may affect the prescribing of certain drugs in different states may have a significant impact on your patient’s treatment plan. In this Assignment, you explore ethical and legal implications of scenarios and consider how to appropriately respond.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The College of Nursing Writing Template with Instructions provided at the Walden Writing Center offers an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected on all stakeholders involved. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected on all stakeholders involved. The response includes accurate explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected for all stakeholders involved. Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs The response includes vague explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected for all stakeholders involved, or the response is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family, or is missing. |
Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
An accurate, detailed, and clear description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided. The response includes specific, detailed, and accurate reference to state laws related to the scenario. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
An accurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided. The response includes accurate reference to state laws related to the scenario. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
A vague or inaccurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided. The response includes inaccurate or vague reference to state laws related to the scenario. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
A vague and inaccurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided, or is missing. The response includes vague and inaccurate reference to state laws related to the scenario, or is missing. |
Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario. The response accurately and completely explains whether they would disclose the error, including an accurate, detailed, and clear justification for the explanation provided. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario. The response accurately explains whether they would disclose the error, including an accurate justification for the explanation provided. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario, or only explains one strategy. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether they would disclose the error, including a justification that is vague, inaccurate, or misaligned to the explanation provided. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains only one strategy that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether they would disclose the error, with no justification provided, or is missing. Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs |
Explain the process of writing prescriptions including strategies to minimize medication errors. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response provides an accurate, detailed, and thorough explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including detailed strategies to minimize medication errors.
|
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides an accurate explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including some strategies to minimize medication errors.
|
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides an inaccurate or vague explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including inaccurate or vague strategies to minimize medication errors.
|
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including inaccurate and vague strategies to minimize medication errors, or is missing.
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
|
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
|
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
|
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|