Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay.
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”? When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay. Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry. Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice? In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed. To Prepare: Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles. Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay. Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected. Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following: Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay. The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article. A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. *I will send a message attching the Matrix Worksheet Template. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay.
Matrix Worksheet Template
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
Arnetz, J. E., Hamblin, L., Russell, J., Upfal, M. J., Luborsky, M., Janisse, J., & Essenmacher, L. (2017). Preventing Patient-to-Worker Violence in Hospitals: Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Intervention. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 59(1), 18–27.
|
Babiarczyk, B., Turbiarz, A., Tomagová, M., Zeleníková, R., Önler, E., Sancho Cantus, D. (2020). Reporting of workplace violence towards nurses in 5 European countries – a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 33(3), 325-338. | Davey, K., Ravishankar, V., Mehta, N., Ahluwalia, T., Blanchard, J., Smith, J., & Douglass, K. (2020). A qualitative study of workplace violence among healthcare providers in emergency departments in India. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(1), 1–9. | Duan, X., Ni, X., Shi, L., Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Mu, H., Li, Z., Liu, X., Fan, L., & Wang, Y. (2019). The impact of workplace violence on job satisfaction, job burnout, and turnover intention: the mediating role of social support. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 93. | |
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) | I chose this article because it addresses violence in a clinical environment. It describes nurses requiring time away from work after an abuse and how it tends to affect them. It also highlights the necessity of leadership as an intervention. | I selected this article as it reflects on both physical and non-physical acts of abuse against health workers at the workplace. It also addresses why cases of abuse in the workplace are not talked about. | I chose this article as it discusses occupational abuse on healthcare professionals in the emergency department. I am now working with psychiatric patients in the emergency department. It reflects on why emergency department personnel are more vulnerable to abuse because of high patient size, high cognitive ability, and rotating personnel. | I selected this article since it is applicable to my new occupation as a Nurse practitioner in the emergency department. Abuse against healthcare providers is of significant relevance and is widespread in the field of healthcare. Workplace abuse can lead to physical harm, emotional stress, and persistent distress for healthcare providers. |
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | This research article seeks to examine the impact of randomized controlled action on the occurrence of patient to nurse violence and associated complications. | The purpose of this research is to analyze five participating European nations, including Spain, Turkey, the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic, and Poland. The purpose of this research is to analyze five participating European nations, including Spain, Turkey, the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic, and Poland to evaluate proof from each country on workplace abuse on healthcare professionals. | This study aims to gather as much information about occupational violence against healthcare professionals in the emergency department in India. | This study seeks to examine the incidence of violence towards doctors, the correlation between job satisfaction, turnover and burnout related to violence in the workplace and Chinese doctors, and to examine prospective support networks. |
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. |
This research was a randomized, controlled experiment that used a mixed-method strategy. Mixed-method study is a research type where a group incorporates aspects of both quantitative and qualitative study methods. The research involved four steps: 1) creation of occupational violence records, 2) matrix development to target high-risk groups, 3) randomized action, and 4) action assessment. All of these steps were assessed over a period of five years. |
This was a quantitative cross-sectional analysis performed in the five countries described above. Generally, cross-sectional analyses are experimental and are considered as descriptive analysis (Setia, 2016). Participants included all nurse practitioners working in hospital facilities and have been in service for at least one year or over. 1089 nurse practitioners gave filled questionnaire, of which 54% reported that they were victims of non-physical abuse. 20% had been subjected to physical abuse and 15% were subjected to both. Patients and/or their family members were the most popular abusers. The most worrying part of the report was that 70% of these cases revealed that no action was taken against the accused. | This was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured face-to – face interviews with emergency department doctors, paramedics, and nurses This was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured face-to – face interviews with emergency department doctors, paramedics, and nurse. An interview was established and utilized with all participants. | This was a quantitative cross-sectional analysis performed using an analytical sampling approach to gather data from March 2017 to May 2017. This sampling approach included data which also involved quantitative analysis. Nine tertiary hospitals were chosen as study sites depending on their positions in the western, southern and central parts of china. Descriptive assessments, a univariate evaluation, a Pearson correlation analysis, and a mediation regression model were used to approximate the incidence of occupational violence and its impact on work satisfaction, turnover retention and workplace burnout. |
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. | One of the strengths of this research is the randomized scope and sample size, which comprised of 2,800 health professionals in 41 units spanning 7 clinics. Additionally, walk-through approach enabled the management to tour each clinic and view how the improvements were made and how they worked. Every tour took a rather short time, excluding psychiatric facilities, in which all workers were concerned in ensuring their safety was a primary goal. | The strength of this study is that all nurses took the same questionnaire and answered similar questions. Study showed that 100% of nurses who responded to the questionnaire acknowledged that the best way to stop abuse in the workplace was to disclose any case. | One of the strengths of this research was the utilization of a standardized interview guide for all interviews. Face to face interviews are highly significant as they reveal to each person that somebody has an interest in the matter. All interviewees were requested to provide preventive measures to help mitigate abuse against ED professionals. | The strength of the study is that all physicians filled a similar questionnaire. The research team had a return of 85 percent of the questionnaires issued. The findings found that workplace abuse was significantly linked to job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover retention. The study also revealed strong social reinforcement for doctors before and after an occurrence of occupational violence. |
General Notes/Comments |
|
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project Essay.