Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

Assessment Description
The effective nurse educator collaborates with partners and the community during the curriculum design process. The purpose of this assignment is to reflect and refine your lesson plan based on collaborative feedback from the preceptor/mentor.

Meet with your preceptor/mentor to review your lesson plan. Discuss your lesson plan and possible barriers to successful implementation. Based on the collaboration with the preceptor, provide a brief summary (200-350 words), to address the following: Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Prior to meeting with the preceptor, reflect on your lesson plan and identify areas of strength and improvement. Describe opportunities for scholarship that will advance your teaching practices.
Describe identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement based on preceptor feedback. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
Explain changes made to the lesson plan based on your findings in items 1 and 2 (above).
Explain the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on your practicum setting) on your lesson plan changes for future implementation.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MSN Nursing Education

6.4: Engage in the professional role of the nurse educator through systematic self-reflection, reflective teaching practice, and exploring opportunities for scholarship.

RUBIC

Benchmark – Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief – Rubric

Reflection (B) Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
5.75 points
Criteria Description
Engage in the professional role of the nurse educator through systematic self-reflection, reflective teaching practice, and exploring opportunities for scholarship. (C6.4)

5. Target
5.75 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are thorough.

4. Acceptable
5.29 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are detailed. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

3. Approaching
5.06 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are present.

2. Insufficient
4.6 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices lack details or is incomplete. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are not present.

Strengths and Improvements
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement.

5. Target Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
6.25 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is thorough.

4. Acceptable
5.75 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is detailed.

3. Approaching
5.5 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is present. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

2. Insufficient
5 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is not present.

Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
Changes Made to Lesson Plan
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement.

5. Target
6.25 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is thorough.

4. Acceptable Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
5.75 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is detailed.

3. Approaching
5.5 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is present.

2. Insufficient
5 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement lacks details or is incomplete. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is not present.

Interprofessional Collaboration
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

5. Target
5.5 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is thorough.

4. Acceptable
5.06 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is detailed. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

3. Approaching
4.84 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is present.

2. Insufficient
4.4 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation lacks details or is incomplete. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is not present. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

Mechanics of Writing
1.25 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay
1.25 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable
1.15 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

3. Approaching
1.1 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

2. Insufficient
1 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Collaboration With Preceptor/Mentor Brief Essay