Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

 

Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development

Healthcare systems are obligated to provide safe and quality care as they fulfill patients’ and workforces’ needs to improve their experiences. Competing needs present in healthcare systems are the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development. These needs should always align with a specific policy’s agenda since they impact the policy’s development. For instance, a policy could advocate for employment and retention of the nursing workforce to address inadequate nurse staffing. This policy needs to satisfy workforce and patient needs while ascertaining that resources are effectively used, or financial cost is low. Research suggests that appropriate utilization and deployment of the healthcare workforce are significant for delivering healthcare services in relation to quality, quantity, and cost (Figueroa et al., 2019).Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

            Failure to effectively utilize and deploy the healthcare workforce has consequences. They might contribute to an oversupply or shortage of clinical staff. An oversupply of clinical or nursing staff often leads to the delivery of quality and quantity services as the staff does not experience burnout and fatigue. However, this might result in economic inefficiencies and misallocation of resources. On the other hand, staff shortage is associated with negative impacts, such as decreased quantity and quality of care due to minimized resources that can be utilized to offer essential services. Also, shortages lead to higher mortality and mobility rates, readmissions, delays, and increased medical errors (Rosenberg, 2019). In healthcare facilities with high patient-to-healthcare staff ratios, the staff experiences dissatisfaction and burnout, ultimately compromising patient safety.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Specific Competing Needs Impacting Workload

Specific competing needs that impact workload, as a national healthcare stressor, are nursing staff needs and patients’ needs. Balancing the two needs is often challenging for healthcare organizations. However, organizations are exploring strategies to balance between patients’ and nurses’ needs to guarantee safe and quality care while ascertaining that operational costs are sustainable.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Saville et al. (2019) affirm that nursing capacity should be directly proportional to patient needs, and this can be achieved through equal or fair distribution of nurses with organizational departments. As nurses are fairly distributed, the workload also is equally distributed and managed. Saville et al. (2019) also claim that achieving sufficient nurse staffing levels is essential to patient safety and outcomes. Therefore, balancing nurse and patient needs decreases workloads. A scheme to ensure an appropriate balance is managing the nursing staff workload. With this, the staff can appropriately use the available resources to balance them with the needed resources, which prevent additional costs for overstaffing a department and avert a decline in patient experiences due to understaffing.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Impacts and How Policy Addresses these Competing Needs

Workload impacts patient and staff needs and organizational resources. It attributes to burnout, which contributes to poor patient outcomes and medical errors. High workloads also facilitate nurse job dissatisfaction and increase staff turnover rates. Consequently, increased staff turnover rates result in heightened costs for training new nurses or hiring temporary employees.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Policies might address competing needs, including patient and workforce needs, by ascertaining an optimal workforce to patient ratio. This can improve workforce experiences in healthcare organizations and promote patient care outcomes. A policy ensuring an optimal workforce to patient ratio can outline a specific nurse to patient ratio depending on the organization’s department. For example, in a surgical department, a policy can suggest a ratio of 4: 1, whereby a single nurse is assigned to four patients. Having a staffing policy can enhance working conditions for staff members and the safety of care. Additionally, resources that would be used in training temporary nurses can be allocated to other areas.Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.

Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

  • Grid View
  • List View
  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

Competing Needs Impact on Policy Development.