Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

This paper utilizes the CDC framework to evaluate the Pacific Care Model Project (PCMP), which includes principles for efficient evaluation as well as processes for conducting evaluations. A customized evaluation for a specific program at a specific moment can be started from scratch using the six interconnected elements of this framework. Although the phases are interrelated and may not occur in a linear order, there is a sequence in which they must be completed; early steps lay the groundwork for later advancement (Edelman & Kudzma, 2021). As a result, choices about how to carry out a step are iterative and ought to be made after extensively discussing earlier phases. This framework uses six steps to complete the evaluation. Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

Step 1: Engage stakeholders

Involving stakeholders—individuals or groups with an interest in the lessons learned from an evaluation and the actions taken with the acquired knowledge—is the first step in the evaluation cycle. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Office of Insular Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior contributed a portion of the funds for the pilot activities for PCMP. The Office of Health Services Research at West Virginia University, the Pacific Basin Medical Association, the Pacific Islands Health Officers Association (PIHOA), the Division of Diabetes Translation, and the National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion contributed further support (Rural Health Information Hub, 2023). Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Step 2: Describe the program

Services associated with PCMP are diabetes clinical performance measures, nutrition counseling, universal gestational diabetes screening, increased diabetes self-management support, increased quality of care, and increased access to care, as well as “one-stop shop” care and other clinic redesigns. The following are clinical outcomes from the initial 16-month pilot: A1C median decrease of 1.4 percentage points at three locations; enhanced clinical performance metrics, including blood pressure management and screening tests, at certain locations; and updated educational resources and materials for people with diabetes and their families that provide information pertinent to their culture.

Step 3: Focus on the evaluation

The focus of this evaluation is embedded in the RE-AIM framework reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Through outreach and growth, more and more collaborations are spreading the care model. The engagement of local NCD team members in virtual sessions throughout the middle of 2020 has increased as a result of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergence (PHE) (Rural Health Information Hub, 2023). Comments showed that the use of virtual spaces had improved collaboration. Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

Step 4: Gather credible evidence

The Pacific NCD Collaborative saw the participation of 11 multidisciplinary teams in 2019 that represented the USAPI healthcare systems in the region. Providers presenting at the twice-yearly Collaborative Learning Sessions showcased ongoing advancements in the diabetes registry database, which permits physician and patient monitoring of preventive care practices, benchmarking, and management of populations amongst the involved healthcare providers. Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

Step 5: Justify conclusions

The number of multifunctional teams involved in the regional healthcare system rose from eleven to twelve by 2020. Diabetes patient registries are still growing, adding individuals who were earlier undiagnosed or failed to follow up. The application of well-established, evidence-based strategies that improve health and avoid or postpone problems from diabetes has persisted. This outcome reveals the efficacy of the implementation of this project in regard to enhancing primary health care and preventive services to realize the healthy island vision (Edelman & Kudzma, 2021).

Step 6: Use lessons learned 

Notably, transitioning the healthcare system requires high-level administrative assistance and approval. Also, partners from across international, federal, regional, and local domains must be in agreement and supportive for the NCD Collaborative to fulfill its full potential. Further, public domain software such as CDEMS, which enables team members to create diabetes registries, enter data, and produce clinical reports to track trends (aggregate and individual), inform management choices, and devise change initiatives, is beneficial for low-resource healthcare settings. Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 1999;48(No.RR-11):1-42. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/materials/frameworksummary.pdf

Edelman, C., & Kudzma, E. C. (2021). Health promotion throughout the life span-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=znJAEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=the+CDC+Six+Steps+Framework+for+Program+Evaluation+described+in+Chapter+10+(Murdaugh+et+al)&ots=1FLxuihGYq&sig=qPxWXN_YTW9LvajXiCiLDvMw9Eo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rural Health Information Hub. (2023). The Pacific Care Model: Charting the Course for Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Management. Accessed on December 6, 2023, from: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/project-examples/952

Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project (PCMP)- Discuss the evaluation of the PCMP rural health project (process, approach, goal achievement, technology, cultural relevance, challenges, and improvements needed). The Pacific Care Model: Charting the Course for Non-communicable Disease Prevention and ManagementLinks to an external site. Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper
https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/project-examples/952
ase Study Scenario: Health Promotion Program Evaluation
Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project (PCMP): Evaluation is undertaken to assess the value of a health promotion program or intervention, if program objectives were achieved, identify its strengths and weaknesses to improve the program, among others. In your response, you are expected to:

Apply the CDC Six Steps Framework for Program Evaluation described in Chapter 10 (Murdaugh et al) to evaluate the Pacific care Model project. Find CDC Framework document hereLinks to an external site..
https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/materials/frameworksummary.pdf

A comprehensive evaluation answers many questions about the program. The framework provides a systematic approach for answering these questions. See page one of the CDC Framework document and Chapter 10 of Murdaugh et al. Also, find a presentation of CDC evaluation guide and tutorial hereLinks to an external site.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjR7eO40qH2AhXWGDQIHcUVArMQFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fasthma%2Fprogram_eval%2Fwebinar1a%2F1a_with_notes.pptx&usg=AOvVaw2XV_B0pfXIU-eMqgx1SbEL Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper

Describe your evaluation of the PCMP for each step of the CDC Framework. Key elements of the project, such as reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) should be addressed. See RE-AIM Framework in Raingruber Chapter 10, page 332. Be clear in explaining how the evaluation questions are used to guide your evaluation response.
Summarize the strengths and challenges of the health promotion program and identify Evaluation of Pacific Care Model Project Discussion Essay Paper