Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper

, ,

Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper

In Topic 3, selections for the West Coast Transit marketing team were made and now your job is to present the recommendation to your director. Surprisingly though, a directive is issued informing management that only four people will be able to staff the team, which will of course increase the pressure finalizing the selection.

Consider the vision for a successful West Coast Transit marketing team composed in Topic 3. Narrow down the team selection to four individuals for presentation to the director. Decide which strategies will be most effective for leading the agreed-upon team. Compose a PowerPoint presentation (10-12 slides) with a justification for the team selection and summary of the decision-making process that addresses the following:

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  1. Who are the four team members, and what was the primary reason each person was selected?
  2. What are the primary strengths of the team? What are its potential weaknesses? How positive is the management team about the team’s potential? Justify your answers with evidence from “West Coast Transit Team Member Profiles.”
  3. What strategies will be most effective for motivating the team, managing conflict, and ensuring its success? Cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies in your answer.
  4. How difficult was it to come to a decision regarding team selection? Which potential team member was most difficult to come to a consensus about? Why?
  5. Justify how the selected team embodies the values of Conscious Capitalism how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process.
  6. Describe how value is created for each stakeholder, and in what ways will the team positively impact the business as a whole?

You are required to use at least three academic references to support your reasoning for the team selection process.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
MGT-605 MGT-605-O500 Benchmark – Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation 130.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 60.0%
Team Member Selection 10.0% Identification of the four team members and explanation for why each individual was selected are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Identification of the four team members and explanation for why each individual was selected are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Identification of the four team members and explanation for why each individual was selected are provided, but at a cursory level. Identification of the four team members and explanation for why each individual was selected are clear and integrated. Identification of the four team members and explanation for why each individual was selected are thorough and well integrated.
Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment 15.0% Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of the potential of the team using justification from the profile of each individual are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of the potential of the team using justification from the profile of each individual are vague or incomplete. Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of the potential of the team using justification from the profile of each individual are provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of the potential of the team using justification from the profile of each individual are clear and integrated. Identification of the primary strengths and weaknesses of the team and an assessment of the potential of the team using justification from the profile of each individual are thorough and well integrated.
Motivation and Management Strategies 15.0% Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are provided, but at a cursory level and may contain inconsistencies. Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are clear and integrated. Strategies for effective motivation, conflict management, and overall team success that cite specific motivational theories, conflict-resolution strategies, and leadership strategies are thorough and well integrated.
Embodiment of Conscious Capitalism 10.0% Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain inconsistencies. Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is clear and integrated. Justification for how the selected team embodies the values of conscious capitalism and how the tenet of stakeholder orientation played a role in the team selection process is thorough and well integrated.
Stakeholder Value 10.0% Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain inconsistencies. Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is clear and integrated. Description of how value is created for each stakeholder and ways the team will positively affect the business as a whole is thorough and well integrated.
Presentation 40.0%
Presentation of Content 15.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 10.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

Final Team Selection for West Coast Transit Presentation Paper