HCR 400 – Week 2 Discussion Assignment
HCR 400 – Week 2 Discussion Assignment
HCR 400 – Week 2
Critical Appraisal of an Intervention
Directions: Locate a study done on an intervention, then answer the questions below.
CITATION OF ARTICLE (1 pt):
SUMMARY OF ARTICLE (in your own words! As if you were explaining the study to a friend who doesn’t understand fancy research lingo) (2 pts):
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
| I. Are the Results Valid? | |
| Guide | Comments |
| Were participants randomized? | |
| Was randomization concealed?
In other words – did participants know what group they were in (not concealed) or not (concealed)? |
|
| Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? | |
| Were participants in treatment and control group similar with respect to known prognostic factors?
In other words – were the participants in the treatment group/control group similar? By what characteristics? |
|
| Were participants aware of group allocation?
In other words – did participants know about the different groups? |
|
| Were clinicians aware of group allocation? | |
| Were outcome assessors aware of group allocation? | |
| Was follow-up complete? |
| II. What are the Results? | |
| Guide | Comments |
| How large was the treatment effect? | |
| How precise was the treatment effect? |
| III. How can I apply the results? | |
| Guide | Comments |
| Can the findings be generalized to a population? | |
| Were all clinically important outcomes (harms and benefits) considered? |
HCR 400 Week 2 – critical appraisal of an intervention – updated 1.13.19
HCR 400 – Week 2 Discussion Assignment
