Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
In this performance assessment, you will describe the collaborative process you would use to identify the data elements needed for project reports and for determining the success of your proposed implementation project. You will also describe the collaborative process you would use to create the project data management plan. You will have the opportunity to develop a project results dissemination plan that will allow you to effectively share your project findings, as well as the opportunity to develop a project closure plan that will allow you to properly wrap up your proposed project.
Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
This task requires the submission of your entire HIP paper template, including the “Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure Plan†section of your HIP paper, which you will be developing in this performance assessment and consists of the following subsections:
ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
• “Project Reportsâ€
• “Data Management Planâ€
• “Results Dissemination Planâ€
• “Project Closure Planâ€
No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Complete the “Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure Plan†section of your healthcare improvement project (HIP) paper by doing the following:
Project Reports Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
A. Explain how you would collaborate with project team members to identify data elements that would be necessary for determining the success of your proposed project.
B. Describe three data elements that you and your project team members may identify as being essential for designing project reports or dashboards, and explain why each of these data elements would be essential.
Data Management Plan
C. Describe the process you would use to identify the data source needed to measure the success of your proposed project in collaboration with your project team, and explain why you would use that data source.
D. Describe the measures you would use to determine the success of your proposed project by doing the following: Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
1. Describe 1–2 key performance indicators (KPIs) that you would use to determine the success of your proposed project.
2. Describe one benchmark you would establish for each KPI you described in part D1.
E. Evaluate the process you would use to collect your quantitative data by doing the following:
1. Explain the method you would use to collect your quantitative data (e.g., downloaded data from a system, data gathered from a survey).
2. Justify the parameters you would use to collect your quantitative data (e.g., dates, data elements, calculated fields, frequency of collection).
F. Evaluate the process you would use to analyze and interpret your data by doing the following:
1. Describe a method you would use to analyze high-priority data (e.g., descriptive statistics such as counts, averages, percentages).
2. Discuss the process you would use to interpret initial results. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
3. Analyze a contextual issue that may potentially affect your proposed project results.
Results Dissemination Plan
G. Describe your plan to disseminate your proposed project results, including the following components:
• the professional setting where you would present your results
• the method you would use to professionally deliver your results
Project Closure Plan
H. Create your plan for the project team wrap-up session by doing the following:
1. Describe the method you would use to acknowledge the organization for its time and support.
2. Describe the method you would use to acknowledge the project team members for their time and effort.
3. Explain how you would use the project team wrap-up session to discuss any next steps.
I. Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting into your HIP paper:
• bias-free language
• objectivity, credibility of sources, and evidence-based approach
• APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective
• a title page and headers
• APA-specific formatting rules for in-text citations and references, margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page, main body, and appendices of your HIP paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures
J. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
RUBRIC
A:COLLABORATION WITH PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not explain how the candidate would collaborate with project team members to identify data elements that would be necessary for determining the success of the proposed project.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission explains the process of collaborating with project team members to identify data elements that would be necessary for determining the success of the proposed project, but the process explained is not logical or not appropriate for collaborating with project team members.
COMPETENT
The submission explains a logical and appropriate process of collaborating with project team members to identify data elements that would be necessary for determining the success of the proposed project. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
B:DATA ELEMENTS
NOT EVIDENT
A description of 3 data elements or an explanation of why each of the data elements would be essential is not provided. Or neither are provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of 3 data elements that may be identified by project team members as essential for designing project reports or dashboards is not logical. Or the explanation of why each of the data elements would be essential is not logical. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
COMPETENT
The description of 3 data elements that may be identified by project team members as essential for designing project reports or dashboards is logical, and the explanation of why each of the data elements would be essential is logical.
C:DATA SOURCE
NOT EVIDENT
A description of the process that would be used to identify the data source needed to measure the success of the proposed project is not provided or an explanation of why the data source would be used is not provided. Or neither are provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of the process that would be used to identify the data source needed to measure the success of the proposed project is not logical. Or the explanation of why that data source would be used to measure the success of the proposed project is not logical.
COMPETENT
The description of the process that would be used to identify the data source needed to measure the success of the proposed project is logical, and the explanation of why that data source would be used to measure the success of the proposed project is logical.
D1:KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR(S)
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe 1–2 KPIs that would be used to determine the success of the proposed project.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes 1–2 KPIs that would be used to determine the success of the proposed project, but 1 or both of the KPIs are not logical, or 1 or both of the KPIs are not feasible for determining success.
COMPETENT
The submission describes 1–2 logical and feasible KPIs that would be used to determine the success of the proposed project.
D2:BENCHMARKS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe 1 benchmark for each of the KPIs identified in part D1.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes 1 benchmark for each of the KPIs identified in part D1, but 1 or more of the benchmarks are not appropriate for the KPI.
COMPETENT
The submission describes 1 appropriate benchmark for each KPI identified in part D1.
E1:DATA COLLECTION METHOD
NOT EVIDENT
An explanation of the method that would be used to collect quantitative data is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The explanation of the method that would be used to collect data is not logical, or the data collection method is not feasible or not appropriate for the collection of quantitative data.
COMPETENT
The explanation of the method that would be used to collect data is logical, and the data collection method is feasible and appropriate for the collection of quantitative data.
E2:DATA COLLECTION PARAMETERS
NOT EVIDENT
A justification of the parameters that would be used to collect quantitative data is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The justification of the parameters that would be used to collect data is not logical, or the parameters that would be used to collect the data are not feasible or not appropriate for collecting quantitative data.
COMPETENT
The justification of the parameters that would be used to collect data is logical, and the parameters that would be used to collect the data are feasible and appropriate for collecting quantitative data.
F1:DATA ANALYSIS METHOD
NOT EVIDENT
A description of a method that would be used to analyze high-priority data is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description of the method that would be used to analyze high-priority data is not logical, or the method that would be used is not appropriate for analyzing the high-priority data. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
COMPETENT
The description of the method that would be used to analyze high-priority data is logical, and the method that would be used is appropriate for analyzing the high-priority data.
ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
F2:INTERPRETATION OF INITIAL RESULTS
NOT EVIDENT
A discussion of the process that would be used to interpret initial results is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The discussion of the process that would be used to interpret initial results is not logical, or the process that would be used is not appropriate for interpreting initial results.
COMPETENT
The discussion of the process that would be used to interpret initial results is logical, and the process that would be used is appropriate for interpreting initial results.
F3:CONTEXTUAL ISSUE
NOT EVIDENT Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
The submission does not analyze a contextual issue that may potentially affect the proposed project results.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission analyzes a contextual issue that may potentially affect the proposed project results, but the analysis is not logical or not relevant to the results.
COMPETENT
The submission analyzes a contextual issue that may potentially affect the proposed project results, and the analysis is logical and relevant to the results.
G:PLAN TO DISSEMINATE RESULTS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe a plan to disseminate the proposed project results.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes a plan to disseminate the proposed project results, but the plan is not feasible or illogical. Or the description is missing 1 or both of the given components.
COMPETENT
The submission describes a feasible and logical plan to disseminate the proposed project results, and the description addresses both of the given components.
H1:ORGANIZATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe a method that would be used to acknowledge the organization for its time and support. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes a method that would be used to acknowledge the organization for its time and support, but the method described is not feasible, not professional, or not appropriate for acknowledgement.
COMPETENT
The submission describes a feasible, professional, and appropriate method that would be used to acknowledge the organization for its time and support.
H2:TEAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe a method that would be used to acknowledge the project team members for their time and effort.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes a method that would be used to acknowledge the project team members for their time and effort, but the method described is not feasible, not professional, or not appropriate for acknowledgement.
COMPETENT
The submission describes a feasible, professional, and appropriate method that would be used to acknowledge the project team members for their time and effort.
H3:DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not explain how the project team wrap-up session would be used to discuss any next steps.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission explains how the project team wrap-up session would be used to discuss any next steps, but the approach is not logical or appropriate for a project team wrap-up session.
COMPETENT Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
The submission explains a logical and appropriate approach for how the project team wrap-up session would be used to discuss any next steps.
I:APA STYLE AND FORMAT
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not incorporate the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not accurately or consistently incorporate 1 or more of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual.
COMPETENT
The submission accurately and consistently incorporates all of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual.
J:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. Healthcare Improvement Project Essay
