Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

Hi,
there’s 2 tasks here. I have uploaded the instructions for both. thanks always! 🙂

No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Complete the “Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure” section of your healthcare improvement project (HIP) paper by doing the following:

Evaluation of the Project

A. Evaluate the effectiveness of your goal and project outcome by doing the following:

1. Compare the results of two key performance indicators (KPIs) to the SMART+C goal and outcome statement you developed in Appendix D to determine the success of the project.

2. Explain how you implemented your project efficiently and effectively by providing an example of each of the following components:

• a method used for efficiency in the project implementation

• a result demonstrating the effectiveness of your project implementation

3. Compare the projected timeline to the actual implementation and determine if the project stayed on schedule. Explain the methods used to keep the project on schedule and the factors that caused delays.

4. Compare the projected budget to the actual implementation costs and determine if the project stayed on budget. Explain the methods for cost containment and any cause of variance between the projected budget and the actual costs. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

B. Submit the “Final Status Report” that you completed during your CPE, which should include the following elements:

• a project summary with the report date, name of the project, and name of the person who prepared the report

• a description of the purpose of your healthcare improvement project (HIP)

• project milestones, including a major task and accomplishment for each phase of the project management life cycle

• a budget overview with the total budget, the total spent, the difference between the two totals (if any), and a reason for the results

• project KPIs with a summary of project performance in meeting the KPIs

• a project outcome with a discussion of the efficiency and effectiveness of implementing your project, along with a conclusion to this section stating whether your project was successful or not in meeting your overall HIP goals and outcome

Project Closure

C. Discuss the processes you used to close your project, and describe how you celebrated the completion of your HIP. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

D. Describe the wrap-up session you held with the project champions and key stakeholders, including details of your team’s recommendations, lessons learned, and next steps.

Conclusion

E. Write a conclusion that reiterates the rationale and purpose of your project, including how your improvement project addresses a need for a quality change, innovation, or improvement.

Note: Your conclusion should not present new information; rather, it should provide new insight and offer creative approaches to guide future work in this area.

1. Discuss the factors that facilitated or impeded the adoption of this improvement project, including specific examples.

2. Discuss how this improvement project is significant to the role of a nurse leader.

F. Submit your entire HIP paper, which should include the following sections:

• Introduction

• Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources

• Healthcare Improvement Project Initiation

• Healthcare Improvement Project Planning

• Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

• Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation Plan

• Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation and Control Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

• Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure

Note: You will only be evaluated on the Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure section for this assessment.

G. Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting in your paper:

• bias-free language

• APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective

• a title page and headers

• in-text citations and references

• APA-specific formatting rules for margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page and main body of your paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures

H. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
A1:COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND PROJECT OUTCOME
NOT EVIDENT

A comparison of KPI results to either the SMART+C goal or the outcome statement is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The comparison presents the results of 2 KPIs but does not determine whether the project’s SMART+C goal or outcome statement has been met, exceeded, or not met. Or the submission compares fewer than 2 KPI results to the project’s SMART+C goal and outcome statement from Appendix D. Or the determination of the success of the project is incorrect.

COMPETENT

The comparison of 2 KPI results to the project SMART+C goal and outcome statement from Appendix D correctly determines whether this project met, exceeded, or did not meet expectations. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

A2:EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROJECT
NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not provide any examples of efficiency or effectiveness.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes only 1 of the required examples, or 1 or both are not relevant to the efficiency or effectiveness of the project implementation. Or the submission includes inaccuracies or incorrectly describes a method or result.

COMPETENT

The submission includes the required examples for the efficiency and effectiveness of the project implementation. The submission is accurate and correctly describes both a method and a result. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

A3:PROJECTED SCHEDULE COMPARISON
NOT EVIDENT

The submission neither compares timelines nor describes methods used to keep the project on schedule or the factors that caused delays.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission compares the projected timeline for the project implementation to the actual timeline but does not accurately determine whether the project stayed on schedule. Or the submission does not explain either specific methods used to keep the project on schedule or the factors that caused delays.

COMPETENT

The submission compares the projected timeline for the project implementation to the actual timeline and accurately determines whether the project stayed on schedule. The submission explains specific methods used to keep the project on schedule and the factors that caused delays.

A4:PROJECTED BUDGET COMPARISON
NOT EVIDENT

The submission neither compares the projected budget to actual implementation costs nor describes methods for cost containment or causes of cost variance. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission compares the projected budget to the actual implementation costs of the project but does not accurately determine whether the project stayed on budget. Or the submission does not describe either specific examples of methods used for cost containment or a reasonable explanation of any cause of variance between the two amounts.

COMPETENT

The submission compares the projected budget to the actual implementation costs of the project and accurately determines whether the project stayed on budget. The submission describes specific examples of methods used for cost containment and a reasonable explanation of any cause of variance between the two amounts. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

B:FINAL STATUS REPORT
NOT EVIDENT

A “Final Status Report” is not submitted.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The “Final Status Report” is submitted, but 1 or more of the given elements are either missing or do not follow the task instructions. Or 1 or more elements within the “Final Status Report” do not reflect the project implementation.

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

COMPETENT

A completed “Final Status Report” is submitted, and all elements of the report, as described in the task instructions, are provided and reflect the project implementation.

C:PROJECT CLOSURE AND CELEBRATION
NOT EVIDENT

The submission neither discusses processes for closing the project nor describes how the completion of the project was celebrated.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission discusses the processes used to close the healthcare improvement project, but the processes discussed are not specific. Or the submission does not describe specific examples of how the closure of the project was celebrated. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

COMPETENT

The submission discusses the specific processes used to close the healthcare improvement project and describes specific examples of how the closure of the project was celebrated.

D:WRAP-UP SESSION
NOT EVIDENT

A description of the wrap-up session is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description of the wrap-up session is missing specific details about either the session participants (i.e., project champions or key stakeholders), team recommendations, lessons learned, or the next steps for the project.

COMPETENT

The description of the wrap-up session provides specific details about the session participants (i.e., project champions and key stakeholders), team recommendations, lessons learned, and the next steps for the project. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

E:CONCLUSION
NOT EVIDENT

A conclusion is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The conclusion does not reiterate the rationale or purpose of the project. Or the conclusion does not plausibly account for how the improvement project addresses a need for quality change, innovation, or improvement.

COMPETENT

The conclusion reiterates the rationale and purpose of the project and plausibly accounts for how the improvement project addresses a need for quality change, innovation, or improvement.

E1:ADOPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not discuss any factors affecting the adoption of the improvement project.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission does not discuss specific factors that facilitated or impeded the adoption of this improvement project, or the factors discussed would not plausibly facilitate or impede the adoption of the project in the setting where the project was implemented.

COMPETENT

The submission discusses specific factors that either facilitated or impeded the adoption of this improvement project, and the factors discussed are plausible given the setting where the project was implemented. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

E2:SIGNIFICANCE TO NURSE LEADER ROLE
NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the improvement project is significant to the role of a nurse leader is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of how the improvement project is significant to the role of a nurse leader includes inaccuracies or does not demonstrate a clear understanding of how a nurse leader influences healthcare organizations.

COMPETENT

The discussion of how the improvement project is significant to the role of a nurse leader is accurate and demonstrate a clear understanding of how a nurse leader influences healthcare organizations.

F:SUBMIT HIP PAPER
NOT EVIDENT

The entire HIP paper is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

Not applicable.

COMPETENT

The entire HIP paper is provided, including all of the given sections.

G:APA STYLE AND FORMAT
NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not incorporate the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission does not accurately or consistently incorporate 1 or more of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

COMPETENT

The submission accurately and consistently incorporates all of the given APA style and format components as described in the current APA manual.

H:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan