Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay
Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay
Covid 19 is the approved topic incase you need to know that. Its in California kingston healthcare. we are working hard on preventing the spread , educating on infection contirol, vaccions for both community and staff and you can explode on that.
Literature Evaluation of Articles Related to the PICOT Inquiry on Interventions that Are Efficacious in Reducing the Rates of Covid-19 Infections in the Community Seen At Kingston Healthcare in California
Student Name:
Change Topic: Reduction of Covid-19 infection rates at the Kingston Healthcare facility in California. PICOT statement: Among the staff and community members seen at Kingston Healthcare (P); does health education on the use of face masks, social distancing, and regular handwashing together with immunization for herd immunity (I) compared to immunization alone (C) reduce the rate of spread of the novel coronavirus (O) within a span of three months (T)? Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay
ORDER A PLAGIARISM -FREE PAPER NOW
| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
Brauer et al.
Environmental Health Perspectives |
Bundgaard et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine |
Chiu et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
|
Chu et al.
The Lancet https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31142-9
|
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Global access to handwashing: Implications for COVID-19 control in low-income countries.
2020 |
Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers.
2020 |
Impact of wearing masks, hand hygiene, and social distancing on influenza, enterovirus, and all-cause pneumonia during the coronavirus pandemic: Retrospective National Epidemiological Surveillance Study.
2020 |
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2020 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
Does handwashing protect against Covid-19 infection? | H0: Addition of the face mask to other Covid-19 measures is not associated with lower rates of Covid-19 infection.
H1: There is a positive correlation between the addition of the face mask to other Covid-19 prevention measures and the reduction of Covid-19 infection rates. |
Does wearing of face masks, handwashing and social distancing prevent all-cause pneumonia including Covid-19? | Do the measures of physical distancing, wearing of face masks, and eye protection prevent person-to-person Covid-19 transmission? |
| Purposes/Aim of Study | To evaluate the global access to handwashing with soap and water to prevent the spread of Covid-19. | To determine if recommending masks when outdoors can significantly reduce coronavirus infections. | To assess the impact of three infection-prevention measures on all-cause pneumonia during the Covid-19 pandemic. | To investigate the role of masks, physical distancing, and eye protection on Covid-19 transmission in both healthcare and community settings. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) | Quantitative study.Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay | Quantitative (RCT). | Quantitative study. | Quantitative study (systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Setting/Sample
|
Setting: Low-income countries.
Sample: 1,062 locations. |
Setting: Denmark (April-May 2020).
Sample: All those adults who spend ≥ 3 hours a day outside without masks (n = 6,024). |
Setting: Taiwan National Infectious Disease Statistics database.
Sample: All patients with influenza, enterovirus, and all-cause pneumonia in the Taiwanese database. |
Setting: electronic research databases.
Sample: n = 25,697 patients. |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
· Observational surveys
· Spatiotemporal Gaussian regression models. |
· 50 surgical masks with proper use instructions.
· Advice to follow social distancing and wear a mask. · Advice to follow social distancing rules without recommendation for a mask. |
Case survey of electronic database. | Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Analysis
|
· Improvement from 1990 (33.6%)
· 2.02 billion persons lacked access to soap and water for handwashing. |
Multiple imputation | Linear regression analysis | · Frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses
· Random effects meta-regressions |
| Key Findings
|
More than half of the Sub-Saharan and Oceania populations did not have access to handwashing in 2019.
In 8 countries, ≥50 million people did not have access. |
· 42 participants (1.8%) of the mask group got Covid-19 infection.
· 53 controls (2.1%) got the infection. |
· Great decrease in all-cause pneumonia incidence
· A decrease in enterovirus incidence. · A decrease in all-cause pneumonia. |
· Protection with lengthening of distance.
· N95 masks gave better protection. · Eye protection protected against infection. |
| Recommendations
|
· Immediate improvements needed.
· Disparities to be addressed with other Covid-19 measures. |
When used with other measures, masks can help reduce the spread of Covid-19. | Masks, handwashing, and social distancing are effective in preventing Covid-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases. They should therefore be used together. | Physical distancing of one meter or more plus face masks and eye protection should be used to protect against Covid-19. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
The article supports the EBP project because it is about handwashing as a novel coronavirus infection prevention. | The article supports the EBP project because it is about masks as a coronavirus prevention measure. | This article is in support of the EBP project because it is about measures to prevent the novel coronavirus infection. | The article relates to the EBP topic because it investigates measures that protect against contracting coronavirus. |
| Criteria | Article 5 | Article 6 | Article 7 | Article 8 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
Harapan et al.
Frontiers in Public Health https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00381
|
Korang et al.
Systematic Reviews http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01516-1
|
Li et al.
American Journal of Infection Control https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.007
|
Qian & Jiang
Journal of Public Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z |
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Southeast Asia: A cross-sectional study in Indonesia.Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay
2020 |
Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A protocol for a living systematic review with network meta-analysis including individual patient data (The LIVING VACCINE Project).
2020 |
Face masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2020 |
COVID-19 and social distancing.
2020 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
Is Covid-19 vaccination accepted as a means of mitigating the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic? | Do vaccines prevent one from contracting Covid-19? | Do face masks prevent the transmission of Covid-19? | Does physical or social distancing prevent Covid-19 infection? |
| Purposes/Aim of Study | To evaluate the acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine that is up to 95% effective in Southeast Asia. | To continually assess the benefits of and harm caused by Covid-19 vaccines. | To assess the effectiveness of face masks in the prevention against infection with the novel coronavirus. | To discuss the social distancing requirements or measures for Covid-19. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Quantitative (cross-sectional online survey) | Quantitative (living systematic review and meta-analysis) | Quantitative (systematic review and meta-analysis) | Qualitative study |
| Setting/Sample
|
Setting: The online space.
Sample: n = 1,359 participants. |
Setting: Electronic database search
Sample: Indefinite number of articles (it is a “living” systematic review) |
Setting: Electronic research databases
Sample: n = 6 articles |
Setting: China in 2020
Sample: n = 343 cities |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments | Interviews (online) | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Cross-sectional survey (literature and document search) |
| Analysis
|
Logistic regression analysis | GRADE and CINeMA approaches | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis | Qualitative analysis |
| Key Findings
|
· 93.3% of respondents would agree to vaccinate with the 95% effective vaccine.
· Only 67% would agree to be vaccinated with the vaccine that is just 50% effective. |
This is a living or ongoing systematic analysis whose findings will be known with the passage of time. | Wearing of face masks is correlated to reduced rates of Covid-19 infection. | 309 cities had no cases while 34 cities had confirmed cases after a series of public physical distancing measures. |
| Recommendations
|
It may be difficult to convince the public to get vaccinated with a low-efficiency vaccine. However, vaccination remains one of the raft of measures to stop the spread of Covid-19. | It is advisable for everyone to get vaccinated against the novel coronavirus. | Face masks should be worn to reduce the risk of Covid-19 infection. | Social or physical distancing is one of the most effective ways of preventing infection with the novel coronavirus. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone
|
This paper is related to the EBP topic as it is about vaccination as a preventive measure against Covid-19 infection.Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay | This article is about vaccination against Covid-19 and so it is related to the EBP topic. | The study supports the EBP project by assessing the efficacy of face masks in preventing infection with Covid-19. | This article is related to the EB topic in that it is about social distancing as a Covid-19 infection prevention measure. |
References
Brauer, M., Zhao, J.T., Bennitt, F.B., & Stanaway, J.D. (2020). Global access to handwashing: Implications for COVID-19 control in low-income countries. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7200
Bundgaard, H., Bundgaard, J.S., Raaschou-Pedersen, D.E.T., von Buchwald, C., Todsen, T., Norsk, J.B., Pries-Heje, M.M., Vissing, C.R., Nielsen, P.B., Winsløw, U.C., Fogh, K., Hasselbalch, R., Kristensen, J.H., Ringgaard, A., Andersen, M.P., Goecke, N.B., Trebbien, R., Skovgaard, K., Benfield, T., … & Iversen, K. (2020). Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1-10. http:dx.doi.org/10.7326/m20-6817
Chiu, N-C., Chi, H., Tai, Y.L., Peng, C-C., Tseng, C-Y., Chen, C-C., Tan, B.F., & Lin, C-Y. (2020). Impact of wearing masks, hand hygiene, and social distancing on influenza, enterovirus, and all-cause pneumonia during the coronavirus pandemic: Retrospective National Epidemiological Surveillance Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e21257. http:dx.doi.org/10.2196/21257
Chu, D.K., Akl, E.A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., & Schünemann, H.J. (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay. The Lancet, 395, 1973-1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31142-9
Harapan, H., Wagner, A.L., Yufika, A., Winardi, W., Anwar, S., Gan, A.K., Setiawan, A.M., Rajamoorthy, Y., Sofyan, H., & Mudatsir, M. (2020). Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Southeast Asia: A cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(381), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00381
Korang, S.K., Juul, S., Nielsen, E.E., Feinberg, J., Siddiqui, F., Ong, G., Klingenberg, S., Veroniki, A.A., Bu, F., Thabane, L., Thomsen, A.R., Jakobsen, J.C., & Gluud, C. (2020). Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A protocol for a living systematic review with network meta-analysis including individual patient data (The LIVING VACCINE Project). Systematic Reviews, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01516-1
Li, Y., Liang, M., Gao, L., Ahmed, M.A., Uy, J.P., Cheng, C., Zhou, Q., & Sun, C. (2020). Face masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Infection Control, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.007
Qian, M., & Jiang, J. (2020). COVID-19 and social distancing. Journal of Public Health, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z
Literature Evaluation Table See Template Essay
