At first glance, it may seem that the realms of politics and nursing exist on somewhat opposite ends of a spectrum. But a closer examination reveals quite a connection between the two.
Nurses occupy a unique and powerful position in the healthcare system. They spend more time than other health professionals in direct patient care. They interact with patients and families, often during times of great need and distress. Because of this, nurses are often among the first to know when the healthcare system does not meet patient needs, and they have a deep understanding of how it might succeed or fail to provide access to safe, affordable care. NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health
In addition to identifying problems with healthcare, nurses are in an equally unique position to improve it. As experts in the delivery of healthcare, nurses can participate in regulatory and legislative processes and can directly impact the laws and rules that govern their practice.
This important course in the MSN program, Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health, examines this impact and explores how nurses can make it a reality. You will examine sources of regulatory and legislative information, and how best to apply this information to analyzing current and future policy. You will consider the role that nurses can play in healthcare program design, implementation, and evaluation. Additionally, you will examine the impact that nurses have on addressing not only local and domestic healthcare issues but global issues as well.
Welcome to Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health!
Photo Credit: [Rocketclips]/[Verve+]/Getty Images
Walden University considers academic integrity to be essential for each student’s intellectual development. Therefore, students and faculty should familiarize themselves with the university’s Code of Conduct, which includes the policy on academic integrity, as outlined in the Walden University Student Handbook. You should also be familiar with Walden’s Technology Policies.
More information about the Code of Conduct is located on the Support, Guidelines, and Policies page.
A violation of academic integrity is any action or attempted action that may result in creating an unfair academic advantage for the student or an unfair academic advantage or disadvantage for any other member or members of the academic community. A violation of academic integrity can include, but is not limited to:
For more information on and examples of the above violations, as well as the review process for Code of Conduct violations, please refer to the Walden University Student Handbook.
Walden University Student Handbook
To review Walden’s policy on academic integrity, visit the Code of Conduct in the Walden University Student Handbook. More information about the Code of Conduct is located on the Support, Guidelines, and Policies page.
Thank you for your commitment to and partnership in maintaining academic integrity.
Walden University Student Handbook
Within the classroom, students can submit drafts to SafeAssign during a course, to be proactive in checking for potential inadvertent plagiarism issues or incorrect APA 7th edition style citations. Please note that this area is for drafts only; and students must submit the final copy of their assignment in the appropriate area in the classroom.
For more information on how to use SafeAssign and interpret originality reports, please refer to the following resource:
SafeAssign Student Tutorial
Click the “SafeAssign Drafts” link below to begin submitting drafts.
To submit your SafeAssign Drafts:
SafeAssign Drafts
As we collaborate with each other throughout the term, you may wish to support other members of the class by sharing documents or other files. Doc Sharing encourages us to collaborate and help each other to be successful.
Click the “Doc Sharing” link to begin sharing files or return to “Course Home” from the slide out menu, and then click “Doc Sharing” from the Blackboard menu!
To participate in Doc Sharing:
Doc Sharing
Similar to Doc Sharing, you may wish to share hyperlinks to articles, web pages, presentations, videos, or other items that are already on the Internet. Posting Webliography items is another great way to help each other to be successful.
NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health
Click the “Webliography” link to begin sharing hyperlinks or return to “Course Home” from the slide out menu, and then click “Webliography” from the Blackboard menu!
To participate in the Webliography:
Webliography
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Meet the Experts: Pioneers in Policy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Policy Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Due By |
Assignment |
---|---|
Week 1, Days 1–2 |
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post. |
Week 1, Day 3 |
Post your initial discussion post. |
Week 1, Days 4-5 |
Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Begin to compose your Assignment. |
Week 1, Day 6 |
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post). Continue to compose your final draft of your Assignment. |
Week 1, Day 7 |
Wrap up Discussion. |
Week 2, Day 1–6 |
Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 2, Day 7 |
Deadline to submit your Assignment. |
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)
- Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)
- Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)
- Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”
- “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)
DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002
Kingdon, J.W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting with applications. Law Review M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331)
Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003.
O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health.
USA.gov. (n.d.). A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a
USA.gov. (n.d.). Executive departments. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.usa.gov/executive-departments
The White House. (n.d.). The cabinet. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-trump-administration/the-cabinet/
Document: Agenda Comparison Grid Template (Word document)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Setting the Agenda [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.
Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
To Prepare:
Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion Rubric
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion
It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.
Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.
As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.
In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:
Part 3: Narrative
Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:
Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
To access your rubric:
Week 2 Assignment Rubric
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
To submit your Assignment:
Week 2 Assignment
To go to the next module:
Module 2
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Legislation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Due By |
Assignment |
---|---|
Week 3, Days 1-2 |
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post. |
Week 3, Day 3 |
Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment. |
Week 3, Days 4-5 |
Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 3, Day 6 |
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post). |
Week 3, Day 7 |
Wrap up Discussion. |
Week 4, Days 1-6 |
Continue to compose your Assignment. |
Week 4, Day 7 |
Deadline to submit your Assignment. |
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56)
- Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 180–183 only)
Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/
Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350.
United States House of Representatives. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/
United States Senate. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/
United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate organization chart for the 115th Congress. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm
Document: Legislation Grid Template (Word document) NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health