Project Milestone Two: Ethical Components of the Malpractice Case Study

In this assignment, you will complete a draft of the next section of your analysis of a malpractice case.

To complete this assignment, review the Milestone Two Rubric and Guidelines document.

You will use the following case to analyze:

Surgery: Iturralde v. Hilo Medical Center

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/hi-intermediate-court-of-appeals/1597588.html

IHP 420 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a physician was found liable for medical malpractice. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Next, you will apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model to describe how the ethics issue could be resolved. You will also include a discussion about possible violations of the code of ethics in your given field. Lastly, you will augment or vary the facts of the case to create a hypothetical scenario that changes the outcome so that the physician is no longer liable for medical malpractice.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Prompt: In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. For this milestone, you will use the facts from the original case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, and apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model.

III. Ethical Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision-

making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidelines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents.

A. Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case.

B. Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case.

C. Select a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient D. Propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents. E. Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the

public.

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Ethical Component: Ethical Issues

Describes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, and supports with research and relevant examples

Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, but description lacks details or does not support with research and relevant examples

Does not describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and does not explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident

18

Ethical Component: Ethical Theory

Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, and supports with research and relevant examples from the case

Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but description lacks detail, is illogical, or does not support with research or relevant examples

Does not describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient

18

Ethical Component: Shared Decision- Project Milestone Two: Ethical Components of the Malpractice Case Study

Making Model

Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient

Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but explanation lacks detail

Does not select a physician– patient shared decision-making model and does not explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient

18

Ethical Component: Ethical Guidelines

Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents

Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory

Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent current and future incidents

18 Project Milestone Two: Ethical Components of the Malpractice Case Study

Ethical Component: Defend

Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public

Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogical

Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public

18

Articulation of

Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%

Project Milestone Two: Ethical Components of the Malpractice Case Study