PUBH 6475 –Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Essay 

PUBH 6475 - week 4 Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Essay

PUBH 6475: Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation | Module 1
Health professionals often engage in health promotion activities when seeking to improve the health of individuals and communities. Health programs play an important role in such health promotion efforts.

ORDER  HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

In the first module of this course, you are introduced to the fields of health education and health promotion and their relationship to program planning. Through the Discussion activity, you review the underlying assumptions of health promotion and examine the concepts of individual responsibility and victim blaming in health promotion.

Schedule
Day 1 of Week 1 Review Learning Resources
Day 2 of Week 1 Continue review of Learning Resources
Day 5 of Week 1 Discussion: Deadline to begin Discussion
Day 6 of Week 1 Continue Discussion
Day 7 of Week 1
Quiz: Check Your Knowledge due

Learning Resources

This page contains the Learning Resources for this week. Be sure to scroll down the page to see all of this week’s assigned Learning Resources.

Required Readings

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2017). Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer (7th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson.

Chapter 1, “Health Education, Health Promotion, Health Education Specialists, and Program Planning” (pp. 1–13)
Adler, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Reducing obesity: Motivating action while not blaming the victim. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 49–70.

Optional Resources

Rosemond, T.N., Blake C.E., Buff S.M., Blake E.W., Dunn, B.L., Browne, T. … Iachini, A.L. (2016). Sensitizing future health professionals to determinants of childhood obesity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(1), 106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.002. Note. Retrieved from Walden University: http://ac.els-cdn.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/S0749379716000283/1-s2.0-S0749379716000283-main.pdf?_tid=b61ffe28-56aa-11e7-95d7-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1498067866_92a78bab6ff3e45c107ece56e4a5a554

Jancey, J., Barnett, L., Smith, J., Binns, C., & Howat, P. (2016). We need a comprehensive approach to health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 27(1), 1-3. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HEv27n1_ED. Retrieved from Walden University: http://search.proquest.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1828210912/fulltextPDF/E747102DEFC54F01PQ/1?accountid=14872

Golden, S. D., McLeroy, K. R., Green, L.W., Earp, J. L., & Lieberman, L.D. (2015). Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1), 8S – 14S. Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1090198115575098

Discussion: Individual Responsibility Versus Victim Blaming in Health Promotion
Discussion Tips for Students

Part of what makes a discussion a discussion and not a lecture is the back-and-forth, in-depth, animated engagement of at least two people. If you start a topic and your colleagues are not engaging in it, consider what you can do to get the conversation going. Include something that would elicit further thoughts and different opinions from colleagues. Remember that discussion supports a discovery learning experience that facilitates a deeper understanding of content from multiple viewpoints. To ensure that your contributions to the Discussion posts are timely, relevant, insightful, and engaging, keep the following in mind as you post:

• Engage in the Discussion as early as possible and continue to post throughout the module.

• Design your posts to elicit multiple points of view from your colleagues.

• Validate your assertions with references and links to credible sources so that your colleagues can check and read the source(s) for themselves.

Academic discussions provide a forum to share insights with your colleagues as you encounter new content. Discussion supports a discovery learning experience that facilitates a deeper understanding of content from multiple viewpoints. To ensure that your contributions to the Discussion posts and responses are timely, relevant, insightful, and engaging, keep the following in mind as you post:

• Be sure to review and follow the Discussion Rubric.

• Engage in the Discussion as early as possible and continue to post throughout the module.

• Design your posts to elicit multiple points of view from your colleagues.

• Validate your assertions with references to credible sources.

Health promotion and disease prevention are based on the idea that optimal health should be promoted and disease should be prevented wherever possible. The focus on preventing disease often leads to tension between encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their own health, on the one hand, and making them feel as if they are somehow responsible for causing their health condition, on the other hand.

To prepare for this Discussion, review the section “Assumptions of Health Promotion” (pp. 9-10) presented in your course text, and the methods utilized in planning a health promotion program. Consider the assumptions of health promotion on which these methods are based, paying particular attention to assumption #8.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 5

Start the Discussion by describing the challenges that program planners face when trying to promote the idea of personal responsibility with regard to health behavior while also trying to avoid placing the blame on individuals for their health status. Is it possible to do both? Explain why or why not.

This Discussion will be available from Day 1 through Day 7 of this module. While you are required to submit your initial post by Day 5, you are encouraged to post early. Once you have submitted your initial post, start responding to your colleagues by no later thanDay 5. Continue to interact frequently with your colleagues through Day 7,supporting your responses with credible sources.

Support your work with specific citations from this module’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to theEssential Guide to APA Style for Walden Studentsto ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct.

PUBH 6475 – week 5 Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Essay

Discussion 2: Project Support Area (Health Promotion Program Proposal)
By Day 3 of Week 5

Post an update on the progress you are making on your Health Promotion Program Proposal. Topics you are to discuss quantitative and/or qualitative methods used to assess the health needs of your chosen community, your proposed strategies to identify program stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships, and program goals and objectives.

This Discussion will be available from Day 1 of Week 4 through Day 7 of Week 5. While you are required to submit your update by Day 3 of Week 5, you are encouraged to post early. Once you have submitted your initial post, begin reviewing the responses of your colleagues. Provide your assessment of the methods used to determine their community’s needs and proposed collaboration strategies. Explain your rationale.

Theory into Practice Plan, Implementation, Evaluation
The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction, purpose, and rational for selecting a nursing theory. I will describe the theory by identifying the purpose, concepts/definitions, relationships/structure, and assumptions. I will use the Chinn & Kramer evaluation criteria to critique this chosen theory. Finally I will describe a plan for implementing the theory into my practice setting, identifying any barriers and challenges.
Introduction and Rationale for Theory
In order to effectively guide practice, it is essential that nurses understand and critique different theories to evaluate them for use in practice. For this paper I have selected Jean Watson’s Human Caring Theory:…show more content…
To provide guidance and direction, ten carative factors are identified that result in the satisfaction of human needs. The first three factors; acting from a humanistic-altruistic set of values, enabling and sustaining faith and hope, and cultivating a sense of sensitivity to self and others form the foundation of caring from which the other seven carative factors are built (“Jean Watson – philosophy and science of caring,” 2010). This theory explains, describes, guides, and supports nursing practice. It gives language to the unspoken beliefs and perspectives of the nursing profession. This allows the nursing professionals to better envision, realize, and articulate their unique role in healthcare (Green & Robichaux, 2009). Human caring is the basis of therapeutic relationships between human beings (Wade & Kasper, 2006) Critical Appraisal of Theory It is important to critically appraise the theory. I have used Chinn and Kramer’s approach to evaluate Jean Watson’s Theory of human caring. This evaluation criteria reflects on the clarity, the simplicity of the theory, asks how general, how accessible, and how important this theory to the nursing profession is. PUBH 6475 – Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Essay