Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper

, ,

Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper

Write a 750-1,000-word essay that analyzes the rhetorical situation of a public document. This public document is the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html. Your analysis should include at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

Rhetorical Analysis

  1. Introduction and Summary of the CDC Website on ADHD

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) provides an informative and comprehensive overview of this common neurological disorder that affects millions of individuals worldwide (Hammond et al., 2022). The website’s main objective is to educate the general public, healthcare providers, and policymakers about ADHD’s prevalence, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options. A close review and analysis of the website reveals that its home page features an attention-grabbing headline, “ADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder,” that immediately captures the reader’s interest. The website’s layout is user-friendly, with clear headings and subheadings, bulleted lists, and numerous hyperlinks to additional resources. Furthermore, the content on the site is evidence-based and backed by research from credible sources like the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper.

A clear definition of ADHD has been clearly provided on the homepage of the site and explains its three subtypes of inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive, and combined. It then goes on to describe the disorder’s symptoms, causes, risk factors, and complications. Emphasis is placed on the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment to improve outcomes and reduce the negative impact of ADHD on individuals’ lives. Also addressed on the site are the common myths and misconceptions about the disease and provides practical tips for parents, educators, and healthcare providers to support individuals with ADHD.

  1. Analysis of the Rhetorical Tools Used on the Site
    1. Ethos, Pathos, and Logos

The CDC website on ADHD effectively employs ethos, pathos, and logos to appeal to its diverse audience. In the context of the website, ethos refers to the site’s credibility and trustworthiness established by the CDC through its reputation as a leading public health agency and its use of evidence-based research to support its claims. For instance, the website cites statistics from the NIMH and the AAP to underscore the prevalence and impact of ADHD on individuals and society. Pathos, or emotional appeals as explained by Lampe (2010), are evident in the use of personal anecdotes and stories to illustrate the challenges and experiences of individuals with ADHD and their families. A good example is that the site features a video of a mother discussing her son’s struggles with ADHD and how she learned to support him better. Lastly, logos, also referred to as logical appeals, are apparent are manifested through the use of clear and concise language, statistics, and expert opinions to present a compelling case for the importance of early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD (Hammond et al., 2022). Emphasis is placed on the scientific consensus that ADHD is a real and significant neurological disorder that requires medical intervention and ongoing management.

  1. Writer’s Tone

The tome applied throughout the CDC site is authoritative, informative, and empathetic. The authoritative tone nature is important because it presents information backed by research from credible sources and provides practical guidance for individuals and healthcare providers. Even more, the tone is informative because it explains complex medical information in clear and accessible language. The value in using an empathetic tone is that it acknowledges the challenges faced by individuals with ADHD and their families and offers practical strategies for managing the disorder.

  1. Writer’s Word Choice

The writer’s word choice on the CDC website on ADHD reflects the assumption that readers may not have a medical background and could be unfamiliar with the terminology and concepts related to ADHD. In view of this, the site uses simplified language that is completely devoid of jargon and technical terms whenever possible. What’s more, the CDC on ADHD uses inclusive language that recognizes the diversity of individuals affected by the condition.

  1. Writer’s Purpose

The individual writer, group of writers or organization tasked with writing the contents of the website purposed to educate and inform the general public, healthcare providers, and policymakers about ADHD’s prevalence, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options. The website aims to dispel common myths and misconceptions about ADHD and promote early detection, diagnosis, and appropriate treatment of the disorder to improve outcomes for individuals with ADHD. Going by the content and tone of voice used by the writer demonstrates a concerted aim to provide practical guidance and support to individuals with ADHD and their families, educators, and healthcare providers.

  • CDC Site Effectiveness

The site is evidently effective for educating and informing the public, healthcare providers, and policymakers about ADHD as its layout is user-friendly, uses clear and concise language, and evidence-based research make it a valuable resource for individuals seeking information about ADHD. Simply put, the site’s emphasis on early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD is particularly noteworthy, as it highlights the importance of timely intervention in managing the disorder’s impact on individuals’ lives. The effectiveness of the site is further enhanced by its inclusion of practical tips and strategies for managing ADHD, including advice for parents, educators, and healthcare providers.

One potential limitation of the website is that it may not fully address the experiences and needs of individuals with ADHD who have co-occurring conditions or disabilities. While the website briefly mentions the possibility of co-occurring conditions such as anxiety or depression, it does not provide in-depth information about how these conditions may affect individuals with ADHD or how they can be effectively managed in conjunction with ADHD.

  1. Conclusion

The CDC website on is an effective public document that employs a variety of rhetorical tools to educate and inform its audience about ADHD’s prevalence, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options and its credibility, empathy, and practicality make it a valuable resource for individuals, healthcare providers, and policymakers seeking information about ADHD. While the website may have some limitations, its overall effectiveness in promoting awareness and understanding of ADHD cannot be understated.

References

Hammond, L., Adams, P., Rubin, P. G., & Ness, E. C. (2022). A rhetorical analysis of intermediary organization documents on college completion policy. Educational Policy, 36(2), 377-406.

Lampe, P. (2010). Rhetorical analysis of pauline texts–quo vadit? Methodological reflections (pp. 3-21). T & T Clark.

Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis of a

Public Document Assignment

Goal

Write a 750-1,000-word essay that analyzes the rhetorical situation of a public document. This public document is the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html. Your analysis should include at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

 Directions

 Complete a close reading of the assigned public document. Then, write a cohesive essay that:

  1. Introduces and summarizes the CDC website on ADHD.
  2. Analyzes the rhetorical tools used on the site (here, you will want to incorporate ideas from your preanalysis below). For instance, your essay could analyze the CDC’s use of ethos, pathos, and logos.
  3. Evaluates the site’s effectiveness (again, ideas from your preanalysis below will be helpful)Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper.

This essay is NOT simply an expository or descriptive essay or an analysis of ADHD. It is an analysis of the site and how effectively the site uses rhetorical tools to get its point across.

First Draft Grading

  • You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft.
  • Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.

 Final Draft Grading

The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.

Sources

  • Include in-text citations and a References page in APA Style for at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.
  • These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.
  • Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
  • Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.

Format

 Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 Lopes Write

  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
  • Please be sure to review your LopesWrite score before submitting the draft to your instructor.

Preparing to Write the Essay

 Read the site closely:

  1. Read the webpage on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
    • Do a first reading that uses underlining, annotation, and summary to make sure you understand what the writer is saying. Go back to any sections that need clarification.
    • On a second reading, pay attention to what the writer(s) of the CDC site is doing by describing the writer’s strategy.

 Conduct a pre-analysis: Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper

  1. Use your close reading to analyze the rhetorical situation of the site.
  2. Here are some questions to guide your analysis.
  3. You do NOT need to answer all of them—pick three that make the most sense to you. Your close reading will help you generate ideas for your essay.
  • What is the context of the issue(s)?
  1. What do you know about the topic?
  2. What issues does the topic raise?
  3. Is there a larger debate, discussion, or controversy already going on?
  4. What seems to be at stake?
  • Who is the writer?
    1. What do you know about the writer’s background, credibility, knowledge of the topic, beliefs, and social allegiances?
  • What is the publication?
    1. What do you know about its intended readers, reputability, political slant, and the topics it covers?
  • How does the writer define the rhetorical situation and identify the call to write?
  1. What is the writer’s orientation toward the issues involved?
  2. What is at stake for the writer?
  • Who is the intended audience?
    1. Is the writer addressing one group or more than one group of readers?
    2. Is the writer trying to bring an audience into being?
    3. What kind of relationship is the writer trying to establish with readers?
    4. What assumptions about readers does the writer seem to make?
  • How does the writer use language?
    1. How does the writer use ethos, pathos, and logos to appeal to the audience? Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper
    2. What is the writer’s tone?
    3. What does the writer’s word choice show about his or her assumptions about readers?
    4. Does the writer use specialized terms or slang?
    5. Are there memorable figures of speech?
    6. Does the writer stereotype?
  • What is your evaluation of the rhetorical effectiveness?
    1. Does the writer accomplish his or her purposes?
    2. What constraints, if any, qualify the writing’s effectiveness?

      ORDER TODAY

Draft the essay:

Once you’ve completed the pre-analysis, draft the essay. The essay should include:

  1. Header, essay title, heading in APA Style
  2. An introduction paragraph with a thesis statement
  3. At least three body paragraphs
  4. A conclusion paragraph

Also, you will need to include a References page and in-text citations formatted in APA Style with at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

Submit this assignment to your instructor in the assignment drop box AND post this draft as an attachment in the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review forum Rhetorical Analysis Assignment Paper

by Day 3 of Week 2.