The Physiological and Psychosocial Measuring Tool Essay Paper

The research focuses on determining the impact of post-aesthetic surgeries on mental health. The researcher has interested in exploring anxiety as a mental problem thus the second study in the study is anxiety.The physiological measuring tool to be utilized is the Braden Risk Scale while the psychosocial measuring tool is the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The Beck Anxiety Inventory is the measuring tool that has 21 questions that are multiple-choice and generate self-reports (Toledano-Toledano et al., 2020). The results are used to determine the severity of mental problems such as anxiety in adults and children.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory demonstrated high internal consistency of α = .92 and test-retest reliability after one week was r (81) = .75. The Beck Anxiety Inventory had to discriminate the anxiety diagnostic groups such as generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder to make a comparison with non-anxiety diagnostic groups such as dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder (Toledano-Toledano et al., 2020). Additionally, the Beck Anxiety Inventory had some moderate correlation with the revised Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale of r (150) = .51 and mild correlation with the revised Hamilton Depression Rating Scale of r (153) = .25. The Physiological and Psychosocial Measuring Tool Essay Paper

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

Conversely, the Braden Risk scale is the physiological measuring tool that determines the physiological impacts of post-aesthetic surgeries on the above mental health problems. The Braden Risk scale was designed to assist healthcare providers to assess and determine the risk of patients developing physiological manifestations related to post-aesthetic surgeries(Delawder, et al., 2021). The scale is made up of six subscales which are summed up to establish the risk of developing physiological problems after aesthetic surgeries

According to Oguz et al. (2021) “the first Turkish reliability and validity tests for this scale were conducted by Oğuz (Cronbach’s alpha=0.95) in 1997. The reliability and validity of the scale were previously found to be high (Bergstrom et al, 1987; Pınar and Oğuz, 1998).” In another study The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient for the Braden scale was .85, showing the scale to be highly reliable, the study also found the Braden risk scale to be valid in identifying patients with pressure injury risk.

References

Delawder, J. M., Leontie, S. L., Maduro, R. S., Morgan, M. K., & Zimbro, K. S. (2021). Predictive validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden skin risk tools in critical care patients: a multisite project. American Journal of Critical Care, 30(2), 140-144.

Toledano-Toledano, F., Moral de la Rubia, J., Domínguez-Guedea, M. T., Nabors, L. A., Barcelata-Eguiarte, B. E., Rocha-Pérez, E., … & Rivera-Rivera, L. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) for family caregivers of children with cancer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7765.

Oguz, G., Şenel, G., Koçak, N., & Karaca, Ş. (2021). The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Palliative Performance Scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 8(4), 413-418. The Physiological and Psychosocial Measuring Tool Essay Paper

In this DB, you will continue with the example in Module One Discussion Board.

For example (this is just an example), the researcher decides to include temperature as a dependent variable (to support CAUTI) and needs to identify a measurement method for temperature. The researcher decides to use Bard Foley Catheters (Series 400 Temperature Sensing). The author would Include a description of Bard Temperature Sensing Foley Catheters (400 Series) from literature.

The researcher is also interested in anxiety and will include anxiety in their study as a secondary research question. What is the strength of the relationship between the length of foley catheter insertion and anxiety in patients cared for in the critical care environment? The researcher will measure anxiety using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The tool is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory (Links to an external site.) that is used for measuring the severity of anxiety (Links to an external site.) in children and adults. The tool has shown high internal consistency (α = .92) and test-retest reliability over 1 week, r(81) = .75. The BAI discriminated anxious diagnostic groups (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, etc.) from non-anxious diagnostic groups (major depression, dysthymic disorder, etc.). In addition, the BAI was moderately correlated with the revised Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, r(150) = .51, and was only mildly correlated with the revised Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, r(153) = .25. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016). The author would also note the reliability and validity of the instruments used in the study. The Physiological and Psychosocial Measuring Tool Essay Paper

Physiological tool: Bard Temperature Sensing Foley Catheter (400 Series)

Psychosocial tool: Beck Anxiety Inventory

For this DB, you will identify both a psychosocial AND a physiological measurement tool that could be used to measure a concept in your area of interest. Post a brief description of the two types of measurement tools in your group discussion forum (one paragraph each). Identify support in the literature (can be from your articles you are using for this DB post) for the reliability and validity of the two types of tools and post a summary of the support (one paragraph) in your group discussion forum. Criteria for the physiological critique can be found in Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2018) Chapter 16. The Physiological and Psychosocial Measuring Tool Essay Paper